Part 52
APPEALS
See also Practice Direction 52
| This Part is referred to in: Part 40 (40.2), Part 47 (47.20), Part 63 (63.17), (63.17), Part 67 (67.1), Part 74 (74.8), Part 76 (76.11), (76.12), (76.15), (76.16), PDP 05b (3.3A), (5.2), PDP 27 (8.1), PDP 39 (1.7A), PDP 40e (5), PDP 44 (23.18), (8.8), PDP 47 (47.1), PDP 48 (57.7), (57.7), PDP 52 (20.3), (2A.1), PDP 54b (4.2), PDP 54c (1.3), PDP 64 (10), (10), PDP 70 (2.4), Directors' Disq. PD (35.2), Insolvency PD (17.22), (17.23), (17.8), Chancery Guide - Chap 10 (10.3), Chancery Guide - Chap 23 (23.1), Chancery Guide - Chap 25 (25.1), (kr1), QB Guide - Chapter 11 (11.1), (11.1), (11.1), (11.1), Patent Ct Guide (7), TCC Guide (8.7.2), Guide to Summary Assessment of Costs (53), SCCO costs guide - Section 24 (24.9), SCCO costs guide - Section 29 (29.10), 03a1368 [102], [103], [103], [104], [99], [99], [99], [99], [99], Anglo-Eastern Trust Ltd v Kermanshahchi [15], Asiansky Television Plc v Bayer-Rosin [7], Assicurazioni Generali v Arab Insurance [192], Audergon v La Baguette Ltd [75], [76], [76], Bailey v Warren [135], Barnet v Hurst [20], Bulled v Khayat [9], Calden v Nunn [41], Citibank N.A. v Rafidian Bank [15], [18], [21], [21], Colley CLC [30], [47], [47], [56], E v Home Department [22], Foenander v Bond Lewis [17], Garratt v Saxby [11], [13], Gregory v Turner [33], Haggis v DPP [24], [25], Harvey Shopfitters Ltd v ADI Ltd [11], Jeyapragash v IAT [4], Jolly v Jay [11], [2], [29], [43], Jones v T Mobile [18], [20], Macintyre v Phillips [44], Markandu Sivasubramaniam v Wandsworth [25], [28], Mason v First Leisure Corporation [15], Moulai v Deputy Public Prosecutor in Creteil France [26], [63], Nine Nepalese Asylum Seekers v IAT [6], Noueiri v Paragon Finance plc [17], [71], Philosophy Inc v Ferretti Studios Srl [32], [33], Plender v Hyams [24], [25], R v Secretary of State for Trade & Industry ex p Eastaway [10], Re MB (a Patient) [39], [42], [44], [46], Re the Children of Mr O'Connell, Mr Whelan and Mr Watson [86], Sayers v Clarke Walker [15], [23], Scribes West Ltd v Relsa Anstalt [1], [2], Smith International Inc v Specialised Petroleum Services Group Ltd [23], [6], Smith v Parole Board [22], [22], Southern & District and Finance PLC v Turner [16], Tanfern v Macdonald [14], [14], [14], [15], [24], [36], [38], [38], The Queen v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [143], Thibierge v Rexam [5], Werner v CIR [28], [30]. |
| This
Part is referred to in the following SIs: Civil Procedure (Amendment No 2) Rules 2000 (Notes), (Notes), Civil Procedure (Amendment No 4) Rules 2000 (29), (Notes), (Notes), Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2005 (4), (4), (4), (4), (4), (4), (Notes), (Notes), Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 4) Rules 2003 (14), (Notes), Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 4) Rules 2004 (17), Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 4) Rules 2005 (11), (9), (Notes), Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 5) Rules 2001 (35), (43), Civil Procedure (Amendment No.2) Rules 2002 (8), (8), Civil Procedure (Amendment No.3) Rules 2006 (13), Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2000 (19), (20), (41), Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2002 (36), Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2006 (7), Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2007 (18). |
I GENERAL RULES ABOUT APPEALS
| SCOPE AND INTERPRETATION
|
|
52.1 |
| (1)
| The rules in this Part apply to appeals to ---
| (a)
| the civil division of the Court of Appeal; |
|
| (4)
| This Part is subject to any rule, enactment or practice direction which sets out special provisions with regard to any particular category of appeal. |
|
| This Rule is referred to in: PDP 52 (4.3), 03a1368 [80], [99], Barnet v Hurst [24], Colley CLC [33], E v Home Department [23], MA Holdings Ltd v Wimpey [17], [20], [23], Sayers v Clarke Walker [15], Slot v Isaac [7], Smith International Inc v Specialised Petroleum Services Group Ltd [23], Tanfern v Macdonald [14], [15], [24], [26]. |
| Changes made to cross reference
after (2) w/e from 6 April 2006. |

PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE PRACTICE DIRECTION
|
|
52.2 |
All parties to an appeal must comply with the relevant practice direction. |
|

PERMISSION
|
|
52.3 |
| (1)
|
| (a)
| where the appeal is from a decision of a judge in a county court or the High Court, except where the appeal is against ---
| (ii)
| a refusal to grant habeas corpus; or |
| (iii)
| a secure accommodation order made under section 25 of the Children Act 1989Acts( 1); or |
|
| (b)
| as provided by the relevant practice direction. |
|
(Other enactments may provide that permission is required for particular appeals) |
| (2)
| An application for permission to appeal may be made ---
| (a)
| to the lower court at the hearing at which the decision to be appealed was made; or |
|
( Rule 52.13(1) provides that permission is required from the Court of Appeal for all appeals to that court from a decision of a county court or the High Court which was itself made on appeal) |
| (4)
| Subject to paragraph (4A), where the appeal court, without a hearing, refuses permission to appeal, the person seeking permission may request the decision to be reconsidered at a hearing. |
| (4A)
|
Where the Court of Appeal refuses permission to appeal without a hearing, it may, if it considers that the application is totally without merit, make an order that the person seeking permission may not request the decision to be reconsidered at a hearing. The court may not make such an order in family proceedings.
('Family proceedings' is defined by section 32 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984) |
| (4B)
|
Rule 3.3(5) will not apply to an order that the person seeking permission may not request the decision to be reconsidered at a hearing made under paragraph (4A). |
| (5)
| A request under paragraph (4) must be filed within 7 days after service of the notice that permission has been refused. |
| (6)
| Permission to appeal may be given only where ---
| (a)
| the court considers that the appeal would have a real prospect of success; or |
| (b)
| there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard. |
|
| (7)
| An order giving permission may ---
| (a)
| limit the issues to be heard; and |
| (b)
| be made subject to conditions. |
|
( Rule 3.1(3) also provides that the court may make an order subject to conditions) |
|
| This Rule is referred to in: Part 76 (76.12), PDP 52 (4.20), (7.2), Chancery Guide - Chap 10 (10.5), Aoun v Bahri [24], Barnet v Hurst [25], [25], [30], Bhamjee v Forsdick [6], Colley CLC [33], [33], [33], [49], Foenander v Bond Lewis [18], Hammerton v Hammerton [52], Hammond v Agrichem [37], [37], [37], [38], Jolly v Jay [43], Jones v T Mobile [2], [3], MA Holdings Ltd v Wimpey [24], [24], Markandu Sivasubramaniam v Wandsworth [26], Noueiri v Paragon Finance plc [16], R v Secretary of State for Trade & Industry ex p Eastaway [10], Re MB (a Patient) [44], [44], [44], [45], S (a child) [23], Slot v Isaac [14], [14], Smith International Inc v Specialised Petroleum Services Group Ltd [5], Tanfern v Macdonald [20], [20], [23], Werner v CIR [29], Wilkinson v LCD [57]. |
Rule 52.3(4A) inserted w/e from
2 October 2006, Rule 52.3(4B) inserted w/e
from 2 October 2006, Rule 52.3(6) amended w/e
from 6 April 2006, Text at start of Rule 52.3(4)
amended w/e from 2 October 2006. |

APPELLANT'S NOTICE
|
|
52.4 |
| (1)
| Where the appellant seeks permission from the appeal court it must be requested in the appellant's notice. |
| (2)
|
| (a)
| such period as may be directed by the lower court (which may be longer or shorter than the period referred to in sub-paragraph (b)); or |
|
| (3)
|
| (a)
| as soon as practicable; and |
| (b)
| in any event not later than 7 days, |
after it is filed. |
|
| This Rule is referred to in: Part 76 (76.12), (76.16), PDP 52 (22.6A), (24.4), QB Guide - Chapter 11 (11.3), TCC Guide (8.7.2), SCCO costs guide - Section 13 (13.3), Barnet v Hurst [28], Colley CLC [45], Jolly v Jay [36], Jones v T Mobile [2], Keen Philips v Field [12], Moulai v Deputy Public Prosecutor in Creteil France [63], [63], [63], Norris v Norris [47], Owusu v Jackson [25], Philosophy Inc v Ferretti Studios Srl [33], Sayers v Clarke Walker [18], [21], [8], Smith v Kvaerner Cementation Foundations Ltd [39], Southern & District and Finance PLC v Turner [9]. |
| Minor amendments made to Rule 52.4
w/e from 6 April 2006. |

RESPONDENT'S NOTICE
|
|
52.5 |
| (2)
|
must file a respondent's notice. |
| (3)
| Where the respondent seeks permission from the appeal court it must be requested in the respondent's notice. |
| (4)
| A respondent's notice must be filed within ---
| (a)
| such period as may be directed by the lower court; or |
| (b)
| where the court makes no such direction, 14 days after the date in paragraph (5). |
|
| (5)
| The date referred to in paragraph (4) is ---
| (a)
| the date the respondent is served with the appellant's notice where --- |
| (c)
| the date the respondent is served with notification that the application for permission to appeal and the appeal itself are to be heard together. |
|
| (6)
|
| (a)
| as soon as practicable; and |
| (b)
| in any event not later than 7 days, |
after it is filed. |
|

VARIATION OF TIME
|
|
52.6 |
| (2)
| The parties may not agree to extend any date or time limit set by ---
| (b)
| the relevant practice direction; or |
|
( Rule 3.1(2)(a) provides that the court may extend or shorten the time for compliance with any rule, practice direction or court order (even if an application for extension is made after the time for compliance has expired)) ( Rule 3.1(2)(b) provides that the court may adjourn or bring forward a hearing) |
| Rule 52.7 - reference amended at
(b) w/e from 2 October 2006. |

AMENDMENT OF APPEAL NOTICE
|
|
52.8 | |

Striking out
(GL)
appeal notices and setting aside or imposing conditions on permission to appeal
|
|
52.9 |
| (1)
|
| (a)
| strike out the whole or part of an appeal notice; |
| (b)
| set aside (GL) permission to appeal in whole or in part; |
| (c)
| impose or vary conditions upon which an appeal may be brought. |
|
| (2)
| The court will only exercise its powers under paragraph (1) where there is a compelling reason for doing so. |
| (3)
| Where a party was present at the hearing at which permission was given he may not subsequently apply for an order that the court exercise its powers under sub-paragraphs (1)(b) or (1)(c). |
|
| This Rule is referred to in: Aoun v Bahri [2], [2], [24], Bell Electrical Ltd v Aweco Appliance Systems [19], [26], [26], [26], CIBC Mellon Trust Co v Mora Hotel Corporation [27], Contract v Rees [18], [18], [21], [26], Hammond v Agrichem [40], [40], [48], Jolly v Jay [46], Noueiri v Paragon Finance plc [18], The Queen v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [79], Vodaphone v Goldings (UK) Ltd [26], [33]. |

APPEAL COURT'S POWERS
|
|
52.10 |
| (1)
| |
( Rule 52.1(4) provides that this Part is subject to any enactment that sets out special provisions with regard to any particular category of appeal --- where such an enactment gives a statutory power to a tribunal, person or other body it may be the case that the appeal court may not exercise that power on an appeal) |
| (2)
|
| (a)
| affirm, set aside or vary any order or judgment made or given by the lower court; |
| (d)
| make orders for the payment of interest; |
|
| (3)
| In an appeal from a claim tried with a jury the Court of Appeal may, instead of ordering a new trial ---
| (b)
| vary an award of damages made by the jury. |
|
( Part 3 contains general rules about the court's case management powers)
| (5)
|
| (a)
|
refuses an application for permission to appeal; |
| (b)
|
strikes out an appellant's notice; or |
and it considers that the application, the appellant's notice or the appeal is totally without merit, the provisions of paragraph (6) must be complied with. |
| (6)
|
Where paragraph (5) applies ---
| (a)
|
the court's order must record the fact that it considers the application, the appellant's notice or the appeal to be totally without merit; and |
| (b)
|
the court must at the same time consider whether it is appropriate to make a civil restraint order. |
|
|
| This Rule is referred to in: PDP 03c (1), 03a1368 [96], Audergon v La Baguette Ltd [76], Capewell v Customs & Excise [45], Contract v Rees [21], [21], [21], Noueiri v Paragon Finance plc [7], Pledge v Smith [13], [13], Tanfern v Macdonald [38], [38], [38], [38]. |
| PParas (5) and (6) inserted into Rule 52.10 w/e from 1 October 2004. |

HEARING OF APPEALS
|
|
52.11 |
| (1)
| Every appeal will be limited to a review of the decision of the lower court unless ---
| (a)
| a practice direction makes different provision for a particular category of appeal; or |
| (b)
| the court considers that in the circumstances of an individual appeal it would be in the interests of justice to hold a re-hearing. |
|
| (2)
| Unless it orders otherwise, the appeal court will not receive ---
| (b)
| evidence which was not before the lower court. |
|
| (4)
| The appeal court may draw any inference of fact which it considers justified on the evidence. |
|
| This Rule is referred to in: Part 76 (76.12), PDP 52 (24.3), 03a1368 [103], [80], [80], [80], [96], [99], [99], [99], Asiansky Television Plc v Bayer-Rosin [80], Assicurazioni Generali v Arab Insurance [13], [193], [7], [7], Atack v Grecham [34], Audergon v La Baguette Ltd [83], [83], [83], [83], [83], Awberry v Marley Building Materials Ltd [15], [6], [9], E v Home Department [68], Floyd v Fairhurst [57], Gillingham v Gillingham [15], Graham v Chorley District Council [37], Hertfordshire v Bubb [35], Hollins v Russell [215], Khudados v Hayden [33], King v Telegraph [54], Paragon Finance Plc v Pender [92], Pledge v Smith [13], [15], Riyad Bank v Ahli United Bank (Uk) plc [26], Robert v Momentum Services Ltd [28], S (a child) [24], Scribes West Ltd v Relsa Anstalt [2], [2], Skjevesland v Geveran Trading Co Ltd [17], Stuart v Goldberg [83], Tanfern v Macdonald [30], [36], Thibierge v Rexam [10], [10], [10], Yenula v Naidu [59]. |

NON-DISCLOSURE OF PART 36 OFFERS AND PAYMENTS
|
|
52.12 |
| (1)
| The fact that a Part 36 offer or payment into court has been made must not be disclosed to any judge of the appeal court who is to hear or determine ---
| (a)
| an application for permission to appeal; or |
until all questions (other than costs) have been determined. |
| (2)
| Paragraph (1) does not apply if the Part 36 offer or payment into court is relevant to the substance of the appeal. |
| (3)
| Paragraph (1) does not prevent disclosure in any application in the appeal proceedings if disclosure of the fact that a Part 36 offer or payment into court has been made is properly relevant to the matter to be decided. |
|
|
|
Rule 52.12(1) replaced
w/e from 1 April 2004; the original read 'The fact that a Part 36
offer or Part 36 payment has been made must not be disclosed to any
judge of the appeal court who is to hear and finally determine an
appeal until all questions (other than costs) have been determined', Text in Rule 52.12(1), (2), and (3) substituted
w/e from 6 April 2007. |

STATUTORY APPEALS --- COURT'S POWER TO HEAR ANY PERSON
|
|
52.12A |
| (1)
|
In a statutory appeal, any person may apply for permission ---
| (b)
|
to make representations at the appeal hearing. |
|
| (2)
|
An application under paragraph (1) must be made promptly. |
|
| Rule 52.12A inserted
w/e from 1 October 2007. |

II SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLYING TO THE COURT OF APPEAL
| SECOND APPEALS TO THE COURT
|
|
52.13 |
| (1)
| Permission is required from the Court of Appeal for any appeal to that court from a decision of a county court or the High Court which was itself made on appeal. |
| (2)
| The Court of Appeal will not give permission unless it considers that --
| (a)
| the appeal would raise an important point of principle or practice; or |
| (b)
| there is some other compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear it. |
|
|
| This Rule is referred to in: SCCO costs guide - Section 13 (13.2), Awberry v Marley Building Materials Ltd [13], Barnet v Hurst [30], [30], Bhamjee v Forsdick [6], Collier v Williams [144], Jolly v Jay [17], [43], Markandu Sivasubramaniam v Wandsworth [20], [20], Miller v Garton Shires [18], [18], [18], [18], [33], Noueiri v Paragon Finance plc [16], Re MB (a Patient) [4], Scammell v Dicker (2) [27], Smith International Inc v Specialised Petroleum Services Group Ltd [16], [23], Uphill v BRB (Residuary) Ltd [18], [19], [24], Vinos v Marks & Spencer [13], Woodhouse v Consignia [9]. |

ASSIGNMENT OF APPEALS TO THE COURT OF APPEAL
|
|
52.14 |
| (1)
|
| (a)
| an appeal which is to be heard by a county court or the High Court would raise an important point of principle or practice; or |
| (b)
| there is some other compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear it, |
|
(The Master of the Rolls has the power to direct that an appeal which would be heard by a county court or the High Court should be heard instead by the Court of Appeal --- see section 57 of the Access to Justice Act 1999)( 2) |
| (2)
| The Master of the Rolls or the Court of Appeal may remit an appeal to the court in which the original appeal was or would have been brought. |
|

JUDICIAL REVIEW APPEALS
|
|
52.15 |
| (1)
| Where permission to apply for judicial review has been refused at a hearing in the High Court, the person seeking that permission may apply to the Court of Appeal for permission to appeal. |
| (2)
| An application in accordance with paragraph (1) must be made within 7 days of the decision of the High Court to refuse to give permission to apply for judicial review. |
| (3)
| On an application under paragraph (1), the Court of Appeal may, instead of giving permission to appeal, give permission to apply for judicial review. |
| (4)
| Where the Court of Appeal gives permission to apply for judicial review in accordance with paragraph (3), the case will proceed in the High Court unless the Court of Appeal orders otherwise. |
|

WHO MAY EXERCISE THE POWERS OF THE COURT OF APPEAL
|
|
52.16 |
| (1)
|
may exercise the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal with regard to the matters set out in paragraph (2) with the consent of the Master of the Rolls. |
| (2)
| The matters referred to in paragraph (1) are ---
| (b)
| any other matter where there is no substantial dispute between the parties; and |
| (c)
| the dismissal of an appeal or application where a party has failed to comply with any order, rule or practice direction. |
|
| (3)
|
| (d)
| a stay
(GL)
of any proceedings, other than a temporary stay of any order or decision of the lower court over a period when the Court of Appeal is not sitting or cannot conveniently be convened. |
|
| (5)
| A party may request any decision of a court officer to be reviewed by the Court of Appeal. |
| (6)
| At the request of a party, a hearing will be held to reconsider a decision of ---
made without a hearing. |
| (6A)
| A request under paragraph (5) or (6) must be filed within 7 days after the party is served with notice of the decision. |
| (7)
| A single judge may refer any matter for a decision by a court consisting of two or more judges. |
( Section 58(2) of the Supreme Court Act 1981Acts( 4) provides that there is no appeal to the House of Lords from decisions of the Court of Appeal that --- |
and which may be called into question by rules of court. Rules 52.16(5) and (6) provide the procedure for the calling into question of such decisions) |
|
| Rule 52.16(6A) inserted w/e from 1 February 2004. |

III Provisions about reopening appeals
| REOPENING OF FINAL APPEALS
|
|
52.17 |
| (1)
| The Court of Appeal or the High Court will not reopen a final determination of any appeal unless ---
| (a)
| it is necessary to do so in order to avoid real injustice; |
| (b)
| the circumstances are exceptional and make it appropriate to reopen the appeal; and |
| (c)
| there is no alternative effective remedy. |
|
| (2)
| In paragraphs (1), (3), (4) and (6), “ appeal” includes an application for permission to appeal. |
| (3)
| This rule does not apply to appeals to a county court. |
| (5)
| There is no right to an oral hearing of an application for permission unless, exceptionally, the judge so directs. |
| (6)
| The judge will not grant permission without directing the application to be served on the other party to the original appeal and giving him an opportunity to make representations. |
| (7)
| There is no right of appeal or review from the decision of the judge on the application for permission, which is final. |
| (8)
| The procedure for making an application for permission is set out in the practice direction. |
|
| Section III inserted w/e from 6 October 2003. |

IV Statutory rights of appeal
Appeals under the Law of Property Act 1922(5)
|
|
52.18 |
An appeal lies to the High Court against a decision of the Secretary of State under paragraph 16 of Schedule 15 to the Law of Property Act 1922Acts( 6). |
|
| Rule 52.18 inserted
w/e from 1 October 2007. |

APPEALS FROM CERTAIN TRIBUNALS
|
|
52.19 |
| (1)
|
A person who was a party to proceedings before a tribunal referred to in section 11(1) of the Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1992( 7) and is dissatisfied in point of law with the decision of the tribunal may appeal to the High Court. |
| (2)
|
The tribunal may, of its own initiative or at the request of a party to the proceedings before it, state, in the form of a special case for the decision of the High Court, a question of law arising in the course of the proceedings. |
|
| Rule 52.19 inserted
w/e from 1 October 2007. |
APPEALS UNDER CERTAIN PLANNING LEGISLATION
|
|
52.20 |
| (1)
|
Where the Secretary of State has given a decision in proceedings on an appeal under Part VII of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990( 8) against an enforcement notice ---
| (c)
|
another person having an interest in the land to which the notice relates, |
may appeal to the High Court against the decision on a point of law. |
| (2)
|
Where the Secretary of State has given a decision in proceedings on an appeal under Part VIII of that Act against a notice under section 207 of that Act ---
| (c)
|
any person (other tha | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |