Part 44
GENERAL RULES ABOUT COSTS
See also Practice Direction 43--48
| This Part is referred to in: Part 40 (40.18), Part 43 (43.1), (43.2), (43.2), (43.2), PDP 27 (7.3), Insolvency PD (16.8), (17.22), TCC Guide (16.1.1), Comm Ct Guide - Pt F (F14.2), Comm Ct Guide - Pt J (J13.2), Guide to Summary Assessment of Costs (16), SCCO costs guide - Section 2 (2.14), SCCO costs guide - Section 25 (25.1), ABCI v Banque Franco-Tunisienne [69], [72], Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd [73], Atack v Grecham [3], BA v British Coal Corporation [33], Brawley v Marczynski [15], Callery v Gray [27], Carver v BAA Plc [34], Charles v NTL [23], [23], [25], Contractreal v Davies [62], Crouch v King's Healthcare NHS Trust [37], [40], [42], [42], [43], Factortame Ltd v Dept of Transport [21], [21], [21], [21], [21], HSS Hire Services Group Plc v BMB Builders Merchants Ltd [30], [35], [39], Haji-Ioannou v Frangos [8], [8], [9], Hall v Stone [75], Home Office v Lownds [36], [4], Huck v Robson [74], [74], McPhilemy v Times (2) [10], [10], Norris v Norris [9], Northstar Systems Ltd v Fielding [5], Petrotrade Inc v Texaco Ltd [60], [85], [85], Reed Executive plc v Reed Business Information Ltd [11], [23], Reza-Delta v UAS [12], [12], Roger v Merthyr Tydfil CBC [103], [99], Sarwar v Alam [17], Simms v The Law Society [27]. |
SCOPE OF THIS PART
|
|
44.1 |
This Part contains general rules about costs and entitlement to costs. |
(The definitions contained in Part 43 are relevant to this Part) |

SOLICITOR'S DUTY TO NOTIFY CLIENT
|
|
44.2 |
| Where ---
| (a)
| the court makes a costs order against a legally represented party; and |
| (b)
| the party is not present when the order is made, |
the party's solicitor must notify his client in writing of the costs order no later than 7 days after the solicitor receives notice of the order. |
|

COURT'S DISCRETION AND CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN EXERCISING ITS DISCRETION AS TO COSTS
|
|
44.3 |
| (1)
| The court has discretion as to ---
| (a)
| whether costs are payable by one party to another; |
| (c)
| when they are to be paid. |
|
| (2)
| If the court decides to make an order about costs ---
| (b)
| the court may make a different order. |
|
| (3)
| The general rule does not apply to the following proceedings ---
| (a)
| proceedings in the Court of Appeal on an application or appeal made in connection with proceedings in the Family Division; or |
| (b)
| proceedings in the Court of Appeal from a judgment, direction, decision or order given or made in probate proceedings or family proceedings. |
|
| (4)
| In deciding what order (if any) to make about costs, the court must have regard to all the circumstances, including ---
| (a)
| the conduct of all the parties; |
| (b)
| whether a party has succeeded on part of his case, even if he has not been wholly successful; and |
| (c)
| any payment into court or admissible offer to settle made by a party which is drawn to the court's attention, and which is not an offer to which costs consequences under Part 36 apply. |
|
| (5)
| The conduct of the parties includes ---
| (a)
| conduct before, as well as during, the proceedings and in particular the extent to which the parties followed any relevant pre-action protocol; |
| (b)
| whether it was reasonable for a party to raise, pursue or contest a particular allegation or issue; |
| (c)
| the manner in which a party has pursued or defended his case or a particular allegation or issue; and |
| (d)
| whether a claimant who has succeeded in his claim, in whole or in part, exaggerated his claim. |
|
| (6)
| The orders which the court may make under this rule include an order that a party must pay ---
| (a)
| a proportion of another party's costs; |
| (b)
| a stated amount in respect of another party's costs; |
| (c)
| costs from or until a certain date only; |
| (g)
| interest on costs from or until a certain date, including a date before judgment. |
|
| (7)
| Where the court would otherwise consider making an order under paragraph (6)(f), it must instead, if practicable, make an order under paragraph (6)(a) or (c). |
| (8)
| Where the court has ordered a party to pay costs, it may order an amount to be paid on account before the costs are assessed. |
| (9)
| Where a party entitled to costs is also liable to pay costs the court may assess the costs which that party is liable to pay and either ---
| (a)
| set off the amount assessed against the amount the party is entitled to be paid and direct him to pay any balance; or |
| (b)
| delay the issue of a certificate for the costs to which the party is entitled until he has paid the amount which he is liable to pay. |
|
|
| This Rule is referred to in: Part 36 (36.14), PDP 44 (12.3), (7.3), PDP 47 (38.3), (38.3), Protocols PD (2.1), Chancery Guide - Chap 11 (11.12), QB Guide - Chapter 2 (2.5), TCC Guide (16.2.6), Guide to Summary Assessment of Costs (74), SCCO costs guide - Section 15 (15.1), (15.1), SCCO costs guide - Section 2 (2.14), (2.3), (2.3), SCCO costs guide - Section 29 (29.8), ABCI v Banque Franco-Tunisienne [71], Agassi v Robinson [21], [60], Alpha Chauffeurs Ltd v Citigate Dealership Ltd [17], [17], [17], Amec Process & Energy Ltd v Stork Engineers & Contractors BV [15], [20], [20], Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd [22], [22], [74], [77], BCT v Brewer [29], [29], [29], Budgen v Gardner [27], [42], [51], Burchell v Bullard [50], Callery v Gray (No 2) [42], Charles v NTL [40], Crosbie v Munroe [29], Davis v Birmingham Coroner [45], Dunnett v Railtrack (Note) [2], Elton John v Price Waterhouse [54], [66], English v Emery Reimbold [115], [116], [116], Groupama Insurance Co Ltd v Overseas Partners Re Ltd [38], [38], [40], H.J. Banks & Co Ltd v Coal Authority [49], [49], HSS Hire Services Group Plc v BMB Builders Merchants Ltd [33], Hall v Stone [82], Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [12], [12], Hamilton v Al Fayed [3], Huck v Robson [22], [53], Johnsey Estates v Environment [35], Johnson v Gore Wood [14], Kastor Navigation Co Ltd v AGF M.A.T. [28], [29], Kastor v AXA [145], [154], King v Telegraph [85], Mitchell v James [36], [36], Mount Cook Land Limited v Westminster City Council [67], Neave v Neave [11], [14], Norris v Norris [61], [61], [61], [64], [64], Northstar Systems Ltd v Fielding [32], [32], Olatawura v Abiloye [10], [10], P & O Nedlloyd BV v Utaniko Ltd [7], [8], Purfleet Farms Ltd v Transport Dept [17], [17], [32], Reed Executive plc v Reed Business Information Ltd [12], Reid Minty v Taylor [27], [27], [27], [29], Reza-Delta v UAS [5], Rowlands v Bryn [12], [12], Sinclair Roche & Temperley v Simatra [94], Straker v Tudor Rose [4], The Queen v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [68], Totalise Ltd v The Motley Fool Ltd [18], [18], Trustees of Stokes Pension Fund v Western Power Distribution (South West) Plc [12], [45], Venture Finance Plc v Mead [22], [22], [25], Williams Corporate Finance Plc v Holland [58]. |
Rule 44.3(2) (costs follow the
event) does not apply in relation to applications to Court of Protection -
see Court of Protection Rules 2001, Text in Rule 44.3(4)(c) amended and Notes in brackets deleted
w/e from 6 April 2007. |

COSTS ORDERS RELATING TO FUNDING ARRANGEMENTS
|
|
44.3A |
| (1)
| |
('Funding arrangement' and 'additional liability' are defined in rule 43.2) |
| (2)
|
| (c)
| make an order for detailed assessment of all the costs. |
|
( Part 47 sets out the procedure for the detailed assessment of costs) |
|
| This Rule is referred to in: PDP 43 (2.4), PDP 44 (19.1), (8.8), PDP 48 (53.10), QB Guide - Chapter 2 (2.5), Guide to Summary Assessment of Costs (19), SCCO costs guide - Section 19 (19.1), Callery v Gray [32], Halloran v Delaney [10], [9], [9], Ku v Liverpool City Council [41]. |

LIMITS ON RECOVERY UNDER FUNDING ARRANGEMENTS
|
|
44.3B |
| (1)
|
| (b)
| any provision made by a membership organisation which exceeds the likely cost to that party of the premium of an insurance policy against the risk of incurring a liability to pay the costs of other parties to the proceedings; |
| (c)
| any additional liability for any period in the proceedings during which he failed to provide information about a funding arrangement in accordance with a rule, practice direction or court order; |
|
| (2)
| This rule does not apply in an assessment under rule 48.9 (assessment of a solicitor's bill to his client). |
( Rule 3.9 sets out the circumstances the court will consider on an application for relief from a sanction for failure to comply with any rule, practice direction or court order) |
|

BASIS OF ASSESSMENT
|
|
44.4 |
| (1)
| Where the court is to assess the amount of costs (whether by summary or detailed assessment) it will assess those costs ---
| (a)
| on the standard basis; or |
| (b)
| on the indemnity basis, |
but the court will not in either case allow costs which have been unreasonably incurred or are unreasonable in amount. |
( Rule 48.3 sets out how the court decides the amount of costs payable under a contract) |
| (2)
| Where the amount of costs is to be assessed on the standard basis, the court will ---
| (a)
| only allow costs which are proportionate to the matters in issue; and |
| (b)
| resolve any doubt which it may have as to whether costs were reasonably incurred or reasonable and proportionate in amount in favour of the paying party. |
|
(Factors which the court may take into account are set out in rule 44.5) |
| (3)
| Where the amount of costs is to be assessed on the indemnity basis, the court will resolve any doubt which it may have as to whether costs were reasonably incurred or were reasonable in amount in favour of the receiving party. |
| (4)
| Where ---
| (a)
| the court makes an order about costs without indicating the basis on which the costs are to be assessed; or |
| (b)
| the court makes an order for costs to be assessed on a basis other than the standard basis or the indemnity basis, the costs will be assessed on the standard basis. |
|
| (6)
| Where the amount of a solicitor's remuneration in respect of non-contentious business is regulated by any general orders made under the Solicitors Act 1974Acts( 1), the amount of the costs to be allowed in respect of any such business which falls to be assessed by the court will be decided in accordance with those general orders rather than this rule and rule 44.5. |
|
| This Rule is referred to in: Part 36 (36.10), PDP 44 (17.8), PDP 48 (54.2), QB Guide - Chapter 2 (2.5), Guide to Summary Assessment of Costs (13), (74), SCCO costs guide - Section 2 (2.4), (2.4), ABCI v Banque Franco-Tunisienne [87], Atack v Grecham [3], Callery v Gray HL [127], Carver v BAA Plc [34], Contractreal v Davies [24], Crosbie v Munroe [22], Davey v Aylesbury Vale District Council [27], Davis v Birmingham Coroner [45], Elton John v Price Waterhouse [51], [7], Garbutt v Edwards [47], Gloucestershire County Council v Evans [29], Halloran v Delaney [9], Re Claims Direct Test Cases [16], Reid Minty v Taylor [25], [27], [39], Roger v Merthyr Tydfil CBC [102], Sarwar v Alam [11], Simms v The Law Society [15], Sinclair Roche & Temperley v Simatra [84], The Queen v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [13]. |

FACTORS TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DECIDING THE AMOUNT OF COSTS
|
|
44.5 |
| (1)
| The court is to have regard to all the circumstances in deciding whether costs were ---
| (a)
| if it is assessing costs on the standard basis ---
| (i)
| proportionately and reasonably incurred; or |
| (ii)
| were proportionate and reasonable in amount, or |
|
| (b)
| if it is assessing costs on the indemnity basis ---
| (i)
| unreasonably incurred; or |
| (ii)
| unreasonable in amount. |
|
|
| (2)
| In particular the court must give effect to any orders which have already been made. |
| (3)
| The court must also have regard to ---
| (a)
| the conduct of all the parties, including in particular ---
| (ii)
| the efforts made, if any, before and during the proceedings in order to try to resolve the dispute; |
|
| (b)
| the amount or value of any money or property involved; |
| (c)
| the importance of the matter to all the parties; |
| (d)
| the particular complexity of the matter or the difficulty or novelty of the questions raised; |
| (e)
| the skill, effort, specialised knowledge and responsibility involved; |
| (f)
| the time spent on the case; and |
| (g)
| the place where and the circumstances in which work or any part of it was done. |
|
( Rule 35.4(4) gives the court power to limit the amount that a party may recover with regard to the fees and expenses of an expert) |
| This Rule is referred to in: Part 21 (21.12), PDP 44 (11.11), (11.6), Chancery Guide - Chap 11 (11.9), QB Guide - Chapter 2 (2.5), Guide to Summary Assessment of Costs (20), (31), (74), (74), SCCO costs guide - Section 20 (20.3), ABCI v Banque Franco-Tunisienne [69], Atack v Grecham [3], Bensusan v Freedman [24], Callery v Gray (No 2) [10], Callery v Gray HL [88], Carver v BAA Plc [34], Contractreal v Davies [62], Elton John v Price Waterhouse [37], [51], Fourie v Le Roux [39], Garbutt v Edwards [47], Gloucestershire County Council v Evans [18], Home Office v Lownds [4], Jemma Trust Company Limited v Liptrott [40], Leigh v Michelin Tyre Plc [21], [21], [21], [21], Northstar Systems Ltd v Fielding [32], [32], [32], [32], [5], Re Claims Direct Test Cases (CA) [29], Re Claims Direct Test Cases [18], Reid Minty v Taylor [19], Roger v Merthyr Tydfil CBC [102], [108], Sarwar v Alam [17], [56], The Queen v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [13], [79]. |
PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSING COSTS
|
|
44.7 |
Where the court orders a party to pay costs to another party (other than fixed costs) it may either ---
| (a)
| make a summary assessment of the costs; or |
unless any rule, practice direction or other enactment provides otherwise. |
(The costs practice direction pdp-43 sets out the factors which will affect the court's decision under this rule) |
|

TIME FOR COMPLYING WITH AN ORDER FOR COSTS
|
|
44.8 |
A party must comply with an order for the payment of costs within 14 days of ---
| (b)
| if the amount of those costs (or part of them) is decided later in accordance with Part 47, the date of the certificate which states the amount; or |
| (c)
| in either case, such later date as the court may specify. |
|
( Part 47 sets out the procedure for detailed assessment of costs) |
|

COSTS ON THE SMALL CLAIMS TRACK AND FAST TRACK
|
|
44.9 |
| (2)
| Once a claim is allocated to a particular track, those special rules shall apply to the period before, as well as after, allocation except where the court or a practice direction provides otherwise. |
|
| Rule 44.9 - 44.12 do not
apply in relation to applications to Court of Protection - see Court of
Protection Rules 2001. |

LIMITATION ON AMOUNT COURT MAY ALLOW WHERE A CLAIM ALLOCATED TO THE FAST TRACK SETTLES BEFORE TRIAL
|
|
44.10 |
| (1)
| Where the court ---
| (a)
| assesses costs in relation to a claim which ---
| (i)
| has been allocated to the fast track; and |
| (ii)
| settles before the start of the trial; and |
|
| (b)
| is considering the amount of costs to be allowed in respect of a party's advocate for preparing for the trial, |
it may not allow, in respect of those advocate's costs, an amount that exceeds the amount of fast track trial costs which would have been payable in relation to the claim had the trial taken place. |
| (2)
| When deciding the amount to be allowed in respect of the advocate's costs, the court shall have regard to ---
| (a)
| when the claim was settled; and |
| (b)
| when the court was notified that the claim had settled. |
|
|

COSTS FOLLOWING ALLOCATION AND RE-ALLOCATION
|
|
44.11 |
| (1)
| Any costs orders made before a claim is allocated will not be affected by allocation. |
| (2)
| Where ---
| (a)
| a claim is allocated to a track; and |
| (b)
| the court subsequently re-allocates that claim to a different track, |
then unless the court orders otherwise, any special rules about costs applying ---
| |
| (i)
| to the first track, will apply to the claim up to the date of re-allocation; and |
| (ii)
| to the second track, will apply from the date of re-allocation. |
|
|
( Part 26 deals with the allocation and re-allocation of claims between tracks ) |
|

CASES WHERE COSTS ORDERS DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN MADE
|
|
44.12 |
| (1)
| Where a right to costs arises under ---
| (a)
| rule 3.7 (defendant's right to costs where claim struck out for non-payment of fees); |
a costs order will be deemed to have been made on the standard basis. |
| (2)
| Interest payable pursuant to section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838Acts( 2) or section 74 of the County Courts Act 1984Acts( 3) on the costs deemed to have been ordered under paragraph (1) shall begin to run from the date on which the event which gave rise to the entitlement to costs occurred. |
|
| Text in Rule 44.12(1)(b) amended and (c) deleted
w/e from 6 April 2007. |

COSTS-ONLY PROCEEDINGS
|
|
44.12A |
| (1)
| This rule sets out a procedure which may be followed where ---
| (a)
| the parties to a dispute have reached an agreement on all issues (including which party is to pay the costs) which is made or confirmed in writing; but |
| (b)
| they have failed to agree the amount of those costs; and |
|
| (3)
| The claim form must contain or be accompanied by the agreement or confirmation. |
| (4)
| Except as provided in paragraph (4A), in proceedings to which this rule applies the court ---
| (a)
| may
| (i)
| make an order for costs to be determined by detailed assessment; or |
| (ii)
| dismiss the claim; and |
|
| (b)
| must dismiss the claim if it is opposed. |
|
| (5)
| Rule 48.3 (amount of costs where costs are payable pursuant to a contract) does not apply to claims started under the procedure in this rule. ( Rule 7.2 provides that proceedings are started when the court issues a claim form at the request of the claimant) |
|
| This Rule is referred to in: Part 45 (45.14), (45.7), PDP 44 (17.10), (17.9), (17.9), PDP 45 (25A.10), QB Guide - Chapter 2 (2.5), QB Guide - Chapter 4 (4.3), SCCO costs guide - Section 21 (21.3), (21.4), Bensusan v Freedman [59], [59], Callery v Gray (No 2) [2], Callery v Gray HL [89], [89], Callery v Gray [123], [54], Crosbie v Munroe [21], [27], Halloran v Delaney [12], [8], Re Claims Direct Test Cases (CA) [30], Re Claims Direct Test Cases [15], [18], Sarwar v Alam [5]. |
Para (1)(c) replaced w/e from 6 October 2003, Para (1A) added w/e from 6 October 2003, Para (4) modified w/e from 6 October 2003, Para (4A) added w/e from 6 October 2003, Rule 44.12A(4) amended by insertion of words w/e from 2 December 2002, Text partially omitted in sub-aragraph (1)(c), paragraph (1A) removed and cross-reference to 21.10 omited from paragraph (1)
w/e from 1 April 2005. |

SPECIAL SITUATIONS
|
|
44.13 |
| (1)
| Where the court makes an order which does not mention costs ---
| (a)
| subject to paragraphs (1A) and (1B), the general rule is that no party is entitled to costs in relation to that order; but |
| (b)
| this does not affect any entitlement of a party to recover costs out of a fund held by him as trustee or personal representative, or pursuant to any lease, mortgage or other security. |
|
| (1A)
|
Where the court makes ---
| (b)
|
an order granting permission to apply for judicial review; or |
| (c)
|
any other order or direction sought by a party on an application without notice, |
and its order does not mention costs, it will be deemed to include an order for applicant's costs in the case.
|
|
| (1B)
|
Any party affected by a deemed order for costs under paragraph (1A) may apply at any time to vary the order. |
| (3)
| Where proceedings are transferred from one court to another, the court to which they are transferred may deal with all the costs, including the costs before the transfer. |
| (4)
| Paragraph (3) is subject to any order of the court which ordered the transfer. |
|
Rule 44.13 amended w/e from 25 March 2002, new Rule 44.13(1A) inserted w/e from 1 October 2005, new Rule 44.13(B) inserted w/e from 1 October 2005, new text inserted in Rule 44.13(1)(a) w/e from 1 October 2005. |

COURT'S POWERS IN RELATION TO MISCONDUCT
|
|
44.14 |
| (1)
| The court may make an order under this rule where ---
| (a)
| a party or his legal representative, in connection with a summary or detailed assessment, fails to comply with a rule, practice direction or court order; or |
|
| (2)
| Where paragraph (1) applies, the court may ---
| (a)
| disallow all or part of the costs which are being assessed; or |
| (b)
| order the party at fault or his legal representative to pay costs which he has caused any other party to incur. |
|
| (3)
| Where ---
| (a)
| the court makes an order under paragraph (2) against a legally represented party; and |
| (b)
| the party is not present when the order is made, |
the party's solicitor must notify his client in writing of the order no later than 7 days after the solicitor receives notice of the order. |
|
| This Rule is referred to in: Part 47 (47.14), (47.8), PDP 44 (18.3), PDP 47 (40.7), Court Service Guide (Intro), SCCO costs guide - Section 16 (16.1), (16.2), (16.3), Garbutt v Edwards [19], [53], Haji-Ioannou v Frangos [1], [10], [10], [10], Leigh v Michelin Tyre Plc [21], Northstar Systems Ltd v Fielding [34], Sinclair Roche & Temperley v Simatra [93]. |

PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT FUNDING ARRANGEMENTS
|
|
44.15 |
| (2)
| Where the funding arrangement has changed, and the information a party has previously provided in accordance with paragraph (1) is no longer accurate, that party must file notice of the change and serve it on all other parties within 7 days. |
| (3)
| Where paragraph (2) applies, and a party has already filed ---
| (a)
| an allocation questionnaire; or |
| (b)
| a pre- trial check list (listing questionnaire) |
|
|
the information to be provided when a party issues or responds to a claim form, files an allocation questionnaire, a pre- trial check list, and a claim for costs; |
|
|
|
| This Rule is referred to in: PDP 07 (3.9), PDP 08 (4.2), PDP 15 (1.4), PDP 16 (13.3), PDP 43 (6.4), PDP 44 (19.3), (19.5), PDP 46 (27.1), PDP 48 (57.9), SCCO costs guide - Section 19 (19.2), Callery v Gray [31], [31], Roger v Merthyr Tydfil CBC [116]. |
| Rule 44.15(3) amended w/e from 2 December 2002. |

ADJOURNMENT WHERE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE SEEKS TO CHALLENGE DISALLOWANCE OF ANY AMOUNT OF PERCENTAGE INCREASE
|
|
44.16 |
| (1)
| This rule applies where the Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000 or the Collective Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000 continues to apply to an agreement which provides for a success fee. |
| (2)
|
Where ---
the court may adjourn the hearing to allow the client to be ---
| |
| (i)
|
notified of the order sought; and |
| (ii)
|
separately represented. |
|
|
(Regulation 3(2)(b) of the Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000, which applies to Conditional Fee Agreements entered into before 1st November 2005, provides that a conditional fee agreement which provides for a success fee must state that any amount of a percentage increase disallowed on assessment ceases to be payable unless the court is satisfied that it should continue to be so payable. Regulation 5(2)(b) of the Collective Conditional Fee Agreements Regulations 2000, which applies to Collective Conditional Fee Agreements entered into before 1st November 2005, makes similar provision in relation to collective conditional fee agreements.) |
Rule 44.16 amended w/e from 26 March 2001, Rule 44.16 substituted for
previous version w/e from 6 April 2006, Rule 44.16: amended w/e from 2 December 2002. |

APPLICATION OF COSTS RULES
|
|
44.17 |
| (a)
| section 11 of the Access to Justice Act 1999, and provisions made under that Act, or |
| (b)
| regulations made under the Legal Aid Act 1988Acts( 4), |
make different provision. (The costs practice direction pdp-43 sets out the procedure to be followed where a party was wholly or partially funded by the Legal Services Commission). |
|
FOOTNOTES
|
1
|
1974 c.47.  |
|
2
|
1838 c.110. Section 17 was amended by S.I. 1998/2940.  |
|
3
|
1984 c.28. Section 74 was amended by section 2 of the Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995 (c.42).  |
|
4
|
1998 c. 34.  |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |