Part 32 EVIDENCE

Contents of this Part
Title	Number
Power of court to control evidence	Rule 32.1
Evidence of witnesses – general rule	Rule 32.2
Evidence by video link or other means	Rule 32.3
Requirement to serve witness statements for use at trial	Rule 32.4
Use at trial of witness statements which have been served	Rule 32.5
Evidence in proceedings other than at trial	Rule 32.6
Order for cross-examination	Rule 32.7
Form of witness statement	Rule 32.8
Witness summaries	Rule 32.9
Consequence of failure to serve witness statement or summary	Rule 32.10
Cross-examination on a witness statement	Rule 32.11
Use of witness statements for other purposes	Rule 32.12
Availability of witness statements for inspection	Rule 32.13
False statements	Rule 32.14
Affidavit evidence	Rule 32.15
Form of affidavit	Rule 32.16
Affidavit made outside the jurisdiction	Rule 32.17
Notice to admit facts	Rule 32.18
Notice to admit or produce documents	Rule 32.19
Notarial acts and instruments	Rule 32.20

Power of court to control evidence

32.1

(1)

The court may control the evidence by giving directions as to –


(a)	the issues on which it requires evidence;


(b)	the nature of the evidence which it requires to decide those issues; and


(c)	the way in which the evidence is to be placed before the court.


(2)	The court may use its power under this rule to exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible.


(3)	The court may limit cross-examination^(GL).

This Rule is referred to in: Part 08 (8.6), Part 27 (27.2), PDP 28 (8.4), PDP 29 (10.4), PDP 32 (21), Casey v Cartwright [18], O’Brien v SW Police [68], [77], O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police (HL) [54].

Evidence of witnesses – general rule

32.2

(1)

The general rule is that any fact which needs to be proved by the evidence of witnesses is to be proved –


(a)	at trial, by their oral evidence given in public; and


(b)	at any other hearing, by their evidence in writing.

(2)

This is subject –


(a)	to any provision to the contrary contained in these Rules or elsewhere; or


(b)	to any order of the court.

This Rule is referred to in: Part 55 (55.8), (55.8), (55.8), Part 65 (65.18), (65.18), (65.18), PDP 32 (1.1), PDP 39 (3.2), Moscow v Bankers Trust [47].

This Rule is referred to in the following SIs: Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2001 (32), (32), (32), Civil Procedure Amendment Rules 2004 (21), (21), (21).

Evidence by video link or other means

32.3

The court may allow a witness to give evidence through a video link or by other means.

This Rule is referred to in: Chancery Guide - Chap 14 (14.14), QB Guide - Chapter 2 (2.7), Polanski v The Conde Nast Publications Limited [53].

Requirement to serve witness statements for use at trial

32.4


(1)	A witness statement is a written statement signed by a person which contains the evidence which that person would be allowed to give orally.


(2)	The court will order a party to serve on the other parties any witness statement of the oral evidence which the party serving the statement intends to rely on in relation to any issues of fact to be decided at the trial.

(3)

The court may give directions as to –


(a)	the order in which witness statements are to be served; and


(b)	whether or not the witness statements are to be filed.

This Rule is referred to in: PDP 32 (21), (21), King v Telegraph [70].

Use at trial of witness statements which have been served

32.5

(1)

If –


(a)	a party has served a witness statement; and


(b)	he wishes to rely at trial on the evidence of the witness who made the statement,

he must call the witness to give oral evidence unless the court orders otherwise or he puts the statement in as hearsay evidence.

(Part 33 contains provisions about hearsay evidence)


(2)	Where a witness is called to give oral evidence under paragraph (1), his witness statement shall stand as his evidence in chief^(GL) unless the court orders otherwise.

(3)

A witness giving oral evidence at trial may with the permission of the court –


(a)	amplify his witness statement; and


(b)	give evidence in relation to new matters which have arisen since the witness statement was served on the other parties.


(4)	The court will give permission under paragraph (3) only if it considers that there is good reason not to confine the evidence of the witness to the contents of his witness statement.

(5)

If a party who has served a witness statement does not –


(a)	call the witness to give evidence at trial; or


(b)	put the witness statement in as hearsay evidence, any other party may put the witness statement in as hearsay evidence.

This Rule is referred to in: PDP 28 (8.4), PDP 29 (10.4), Chancery Guide - Chap 8 (8.13), Comm Ct Guide - Pt H (H1.6), (H1.7).

Evidence in proceedings other than at trial

32.6


(1)	Subject to paragraph (2), the general rule is that evidence at hearings other than the trial is to be by witness statement unless the court, a practice direction or any other enactment requires otherwise.

(2)

At hearings other than the trial, a party may, rely on the matters set out in –


(a)	his statement of case; or


(b)	his application notice, if the statement of case or application notice is verified by a statement of truth.

This Rule is referred to in: PDP 24 (1.1), PDP 26 (12.4), PDP 32 (21), (21), (21), QB Guide - Chapter 5 (5.6), Comm Ct Guide - Pt F (F7.3).

This Rule is referred to in the following SIs: Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2000 (17).

Amendments to Rule 32.6 w/e from 2 May 2000.

Order for cross-examination

32.7


(1)	Where, at a hearing other than the trial, evidence is given in writing, any party may apply to the court for permission to cross-examine the person giving the evidence.


(2)	If the court gives permission under paragraph (1) but the person in question does not attend as required by the order, his evidence may not be used unless the court gives permission.

This Rule is referred to in: Polanski v The Conde Nast Publications Limited [23].

Form of witness statement

32.8

A witness statement must comply with the requirements set out in the relevant practice direction.

(Part 22 requires a witness statement to be verified by a statement of truth)

This Rule is referred to in: PDP 04 (3.2), King v Telegraph [71].

Witness summaries

32.9

(1)

A party who –


(a)	is required to serve a witness statement for use at trial; but


(b)	is unable to obtain one, may apply, without notice, for permission to serve a witness summary instead.

(2)

A witness summary is a summary of –


(a)	the evidence, if known, which would otherwise be included in a witness statement; or


(b)	if the evidence is not known, the matters about which the party serving the witness summary proposes to question the witness.


(3)	Unless the court orders otherwise, a witness summary must include the name and address of the intended witness.


(4)	Unless the court orders otherwise, a witness summary must be served within the period in which a witness statement would have had to be served.


(5)	Where a party serves a witness summary, so far as practicable rules 32.4 (requirement to serve witness statements for use at trial), 32.5(3) (amplifying witness statements), and 32.8 (form of witness statement) shall apply to the summary.

Consequence of failure to serve witness statement or summary

32.10

If a witness statement or a witness summary for use at trial is not served in respect of an intended witness within the time specified by the court, then the witness may not be called to give oral evidence unless the court gives permission.

This Rule is referred to in: Bansal v Cheema [12].

Cross-examination on a witness statement

32.11

Where a witness is called to give evidence at trial, he may be cross-examined on his witness statement whether or not the statement or any part of it was referred to during the witness’s evidence in chief^(GL).

Use of witness statements for other purposes

32.12


(1)	Except as provided by this rule, a witness statement may be used only for the purpose of the proceedings in which it is served.

(2)

Paragraph (1) does not apply if and to the extent that –


(a)	the witness gives consent in writing to some other use of it;


(b)	the court gives permission for some other use; or


(c)	the witness statement has been put in evidence at a hearing held in public.

Availability of witness statements for inspection

32.13


(1)	A witness statement which stands as evidence in chief^(GL) is open to inspection during the course of the trial unless the court otherwise directs.


(2)	Any person may ask for a direction that a witness statement is not open to inspection.

(3)

The court will not make a direction under paragraph (2) unless it is satisfied that a witness statement should not be open to inspection because of –


(a)	the interests of justice;


(b)	the public interest;


(c)	the nature of any expert medical evidence in the statement;


(d)	the nature of any confidential information (including information relating to personal financial matters) in the statement; or


(e)	the need to protect the interests of any child or protected party.


(4)	The court may exclude from inspection words or passages in the statement.

This Rule is referred to in: Part 34 (34.11), PDP 32 (21), (21), (24.1), Moscow v Bankers Trust [21].

This Rule is referred to in the following SIs: Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2001 (12), Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2007 (10).

New text substituted in Rule 32.13(3)(e) w/e from 1 October 2007,
Rule 32.13(1) amended w/e from 26 March 2001.

False statements

32.14


(1)	Proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against a person if he makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. (Part 22 makes provision for a statement of truth)

(2)

Proceedings under this rule may be brought only –


(a)	by the Attorney General; or


(b)	with the permission of the court.

This Rule is referred to in: Part 78 (78.16), PDP 07 (7.3), PDP 07e (9.3), PDP 15 (2.3), PDP 16 (11.3), PDP 20 (4.3), PDP 22 (5), PDP 32 (26.3), PDP 35 (3.3), PDP 51c (9.3), PDP 55b (8.3), QB Guide - Chapter 7 (7.10), Comm Ct Guide - Pt F (F7.4), Comm Ct Guide - Pt H (H1.1), KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton [11].

This Rule is referred to in the following SIs: Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2008 (44), (44), (44).

Affidavit evidence

32.15


(1)	Evidence must be given by affidavit^(GL) instead of or in addition to a witness statement if this is required by the court, a provision contained in any other rule, a practice direction or any other enactment.


(2)	Nothing in these Rules prevents a witness giving evidence by affidavit^(GL) at a hearing other than the trial if he chooses to do so in a case where paragraph (1) does not apply, but the party putting forward the affidavit^(GL) may not recover the additional cost of making it from any other party unless the court orders otherwise.

This Rule is referred to in: PDP 32 (1.6), (21).

Form of affidavit

32.16

An affidavit^(GL) must comply with the requirements set out in the relevant practice direction.

This Rule is referred to in: PDP 04 (3.2).

Affidavit made outside the jurisdiction

32.17

A person may make an affidavit^(GL) outside the jurisdiction in accordance with –


(a)	this Part; or


(b)	the law of the place where he makes the affidavit^(GL).

Notice to admit facts

32.18


(1)	A party may serve notice on another party requiring him to admit the facts, or the part of the case of the serving party, specified in the notice.


(2)	A notice to admit facts must be served no later than 21 days before the trial.

(3)

Where the other party makes any admission in response to the notice, the admission may be used against him only –


(a)	in the proceedings in which the notice to admit is served; and


(b)	by the party who served the notice.


(4)	The court may allow a party to amend or withdraw any admission made by him on such terms as it thinks just.

This Rule is referred to in: PDP 04 (3.2), Patent Ct Guide (9.2).

Notice to admit or produce documents

32.19


(1)	A party shall be deemed to admit the authenticity of a document disclosed to him under Part 31 (disclosure and inspection of documents) unless he serves notice that he wishes the document to be proved at trial.

(2)

A notice to prove a document must be served –


(a)	by the latest date for serving witness statements; or


(b)	within 7 days of disclosure of the document, whichever is later.

This Rule is referred to in: PDP 04 (3.2), Chancery Guide - Chap 7 (7.14), Comm Ct Guide - Pt E (E4.5), Comm Ct Guide - Pt J (J8), Comm Ct Guide - Pt N (N9.2).

This Rule is referred to in the following SIs: Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 3) Rules 2005 (36).

Notarial acts and instruments

32.20

A notarial act or instrument may be received in evidence without further proof as duly authenticated in accordance with the requirements of law unless the contrary is proved.

This Rule is referred to in the following SIs: Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 3) Rules 2005 (Notes).

New Rule 32.30 added w/e from 1 October 2005.