Note: This file does not form part of the Ministry of Justice site. The files on that site are the only official versions of the CPRs and Practice Directions. Please also note that the cross-references are not claimed to be comprehensive.

Click here to reload this page into top frame
Click here for a printable PDF version of this page



This Part is referred to in: Part 22 (22.1), Part 38 (38.1), PDP 16 (15.2), PDP 19 (5.2), PDP 32 (26.3), PDP 58 (8), E v Home Department [41], Gregson v Channel Four [18], Maridive v CNA [72], Moat Housing Group South Ltd v Harris [122], Thurrock BC v Secretary of State [26], [36].
This Part is referred to in the following SIs: Court of Protection Rules 2007 (139), (Notes).

Part 17 AMENDMENTS TO STATEMENTS OF CASE

Amendments to statements of case
17.1   
(1)     A party may amend his statement of case at any time before it has been served on any other party.
(2)     If his statement of case has been served, a party may amend it only –
(a)     with the written consent of all the other parties; or
(b)     with the permission of the court.
(3)     If a statement of case has been served, an application to amend it by removing, adding or substituting a party must be made in accordance with rule 19.4.

(Part 22 requires amendments to a statement of case to be verified by a statement of truth unless the court orders otherwise)

This Rule is referred to in: PDP 17 (2.1), Maridive v CNA [33], SX Holdings v Synchronet [28], Thurrock BC v Secretary of State [26].
This Rule is referred to in the following SIs: Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2000 (7).
Amendments to Rule 17.1 w/e from 2 May 2000.
Back to top of page
Power of court to disallow amendments made without permission
17.2   
(1)     If a party has amended his statement of case where permission of the court was not required, the court may disallow the amendment.
(2)     A party may apply to the court for an order under paragraph (1) within 14 days of service of a copy of the amended statement of case on him.
This Rule is referred to in: Goode v Martin [37].
Back to top of page
Amendments to statements of case with the permission of the court
17.3   
(1)     Where the court gives permission for a party to amend his statement of case, it may give directions as to –
(a)     amendments to be made to any other statement of case; and
(b)     service of any amended statement of case.
(2)     The power of the court to give permission under this rule is subject to –
(a)     rule 19.1 (change of parties – general);
(b)     rule 19.4 (special provisions about adding or substituting parties after the end of a relevant limitation period(GL)); and
(c)     rule 17.4 (amendments of statement of case after the end of a relevant limitation period).
Back to top of page
Amendments to statements of case after the end of a relevant limitation period
17.4   
(1)     This rule applies where –
(a)     a party applies to amend his statement of case in one of the ways mentioned in this rule; and
(b)     a period of limitation has expired under –
(i)     the Limitation Act 1980Acts1;
(ii)     the Foreign Limitation Periods Act 1984Acts2; or
(iii)     any other enactment which allows such an amendment, or under which such an amendment is allowed.
(2)     The court may allow an amendment whose effect will be to add or substitute a new claim, but only if the new claim arises out of the same facts or substantially the same facts as a claim in respect of which the party applying for permission has already claimed a remedy in the proceedings.
(3)     The court may allow an amendment to correct a mistake as to the name of a party, but only where the mistake was genuine and not one which would cause reasonable doubt as to the identity of the party in question.
(4)     The court may allow an amendment to alter the capacity in which a party claims if the new capacity is one which that party had when the proceedings started or has since acquired.

(Rule 19.5 specifies the circumstances in which the court may allow a new party to be added or substituted after the end of a relevant limitation period(GL))

This Rule is referred to in: Part 19 (19.5), Adelson v Associated Newspapers Ltd [44], [44], [62], [63], Expandable Ltd v Rubin [28], Goode v Martin [46], [46], Gregson v Channel Four [20], [29], [29], [33], [33], H.J. Banks & Co Ltd v Coal Authority [46], Haq v Singh [10], [10], [11], [33], Kesslar v Moore & Tibbits [16], [16], Maridive v CNA [72], [74], Roberts v Gill [35], [57], Smithkline Beecham plc v Horne-Roberts [36], [36], [37], Thurrock BC v Secretary of State [26], [26], Weston v Gribben [26], [52].
This Rule is referred to in the following SIs: Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2000 (41), Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2001 (7), (7).
Amendments to Rule 17.4 and cross-reference w/e from 26 March 2001.
Back to top of page

Footnotes

1. 1980 c.58. Return to footnote 1
2. 1984 c.16. Return to footnote 2
3. 1995 c.21. Return to footnote 3
Back to top of page