See also Part 52
PRACTICE DIRECTION 52 – APPEALS
This Practice Direction supplements Part 52
| 1.1 |
This Practice Direction is divided into four sections: |
| Para 1.1 replaced with new text w/e from 6 October 2003. |
| 2.1 |
This practice direction applies to all appeals to which Part 52 applies except where specific provision is made for appeals to the Court of Appeal. |
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Haggis v DPP [26]. |
For the purpose only of appeals to the Court of Appeal from cases in family proceedings this Practice Direction will apply with such modifications as may be required.
| 2A.1 |
The court or judge to which an appeal is to be made (subject to obtaining any necessary permission) is set out in the tables below: Table 11 addresses appeals in cases other than insolvency proceedings and those cases to which Table 3 applies; Table 2 addresses insolvency proceedings; and Table 3 addresses certain family cases to which CPR Part 52 may apply. The tables do not include so-called ‘leap frog’ appeals either to the Court of Appeal pursuant to s. 57 of the Access to Justice Act 1999 or to the House of Lords pursuant to s 13 of the Administration of Justice Act 1969. (An interactive routes of appeal guide can be found on the Court of Appeal’s website at http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/infoabout/coa_civil/routes_app/index.htm) Table 1In this Table, reference to –
Table 2Insolvency proceedingsIn this Table references to a ‘Circuit judge’ include a recorder or a district judge who is exercising the jurisdiction of a circuit judge with the permission of the designated civil judge in respect of that case (see: Practice Direction 2B, paragraph 11.1(d)).
Table 3Proceedings which may be heard in the Family Division of the High Court and to which the CPR may apply.The proceedings to which this table will apply include proceedings under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 and proceedings under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. For the meaning of ‘final decision’ for the purposes of this table see paragraphs 2A.2 and 2A.3 below.
|
| 2A.2 |
A ‘final decision’ is a decision of a court that would finally determine (subject to any possible appeal or detailed assessment of costs) the entire proceedings whichever way the court decided the issues before it. Decisions made on an application to strike-out or for summary judgment are not final decisions for the purpose of determining the appropriate route of appeal (Art. 1 Access to Justice Act 1999 (Destination of Appeals) Order 2000). Accordingly:
are not final decisions for this purpose. |
| 2A.3 |
A decision of a court is to be treated as a final decision for routes of appeal purposes where it:
Accordingly, a judgment on liability at the end of a split trial is a ‘final decision’ for this purpose and the judgment at the conclusion of the assessment of damages following a judgment on liability is also a ‘final decision’ for this purpose. |
| 2A.4 |
is not a ‘final decision’ and any appeal from such an order will follow the routes of appeal set out in the tables above. |
(Section 16(1) of the Supreme Court Act 1981Acts (as amended); section 77(1) of the County Courts Act 1984 (as amended); and the Access to Justice Act 1999 (Destination of Appeals) Order 2000 set out the provisions governing routes of appeal).
| 2A.5 |
|
| 3.1 |
Rule 52.11(3) (a) and (b) sets out the circumstances in which the appeal court will allow an appeal. |
| 3.2 |
The grounds of appeal should –
|
| 4.1 |
Rule 52.3 sets out the circumstances when permission to appeal is required. |
| 4.2 |
is required for all appeals to the Court of Appeal except as provided for by statute or rule 52.3. (The requirement of permission to appeal may be imposed by a practice direction – see rule 52.3(b)) |
| 4.3 |
Where the lower court is not required to give permission to appeal, it may give an indication of its opinion as to whether permission should be given. (Rule 52.1(3)(c) defines ‘lower court’) |
| 4.3A |
(Rule 40.2(4) contains requirements as to the contents of the judgment or order in these circumstances.) |
| Para 4.3A inserted w/e from 6 April 2006. |
Where no application for permission to appeal has been made in accordance with rule 52.3(2)(a) but a party requests further time to make such an application, the court may adjourn the hearing to give that party the opportunity to do so.
| Para 4.3B inserted w/e from 6 April 2006. |
| 4.4 | Case management decisions include decisions made under rule 3.1(2) and decisions about:
|
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Macintyre v Phillips [44]. |
Where the application is for permission to appeal from a case management decision, the court dealing with the application may take into account whether:
| (1) | the issue is of sufficient significance to justify the costs of an appeal; |
| (2) | the procedural consequences of an appeal (e.g. loss of trial date) outweigh the significance of the case management decision; |
| (3) | it would be more convenient to determine the issue at or after trial. |
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Macintyre v Phillips [44]. |
| 4.6 | An application for permission should be made orally at the hearing at which the decision to be appealed against is made. |
| 4.7 |
an application for permission to appeal may be made to the appeal court in accordance with rules 52.3(2) and (3). |
| 4.8 | There is no appeal from a decision of the appeal court to allow or refuse permission to appeal to that court (although where the appeal court, without a hearing, refuses permission to appeal, the person seeking permission may request that decision to be reconsidered at a hearing). See section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act and rule 52.3(2), (3), (4) and (5). |
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Jolly v Jay [18], Paragon Finance Plc v Pender [35], Seray-Wurie v Hackney BC [1], Slot v Isaac [11], Tanfern v Macdonald [20]. |
| Paragraph 4.8 amended w/e from 2 December 2002. |
An application for permission to appeal from a decision of the High Court or a county court which was itself made on appeal must be made to the Court of Appeal.
| 4.10 |
If permission to appeal is granted the appeal will be heard by the Court of Appeal. |
| 4.11 | Applications for permission to appeal may be considered by the appeal court without a hearing. |
| 4.12 | If permission is granted without a hearing the parties will be notified of that decision and the procedure in paragraphs 6.1 to 6.6 will then apply. |
| 4.13 | If permission is refused without a hearing the parties will be notified of that decision with the reasons for it. The decision is subject to the appellant's right to have it reconsidered at an oral hearing. This may be before the same judge. |
| 4.14 | A request for the decision to be reconsidered at an oral hearing must be filed at the appeal court within 7 days after service of the notice that permission has been refused. A copy of the request must be served by the appellant on the respondent at the same time. |
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Jolly v Jay [33], [9], Slot v Isaac [14]. |
| Paragraph 4.14 amended w/e from 2 December 2002. |
| 4.14A |
|
| 4.15 | Notice of a permission hearing will be given to the respondent but he is not required to attend unless the court requests him to do so. |
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Jolly v Jay [41]. |
If the court requests the respondent's attendance at the permission hearing, the appellant must supply the respondent with a copy of the appeal bundle (see paragraph 5.6A) within 7 days of being notified of the request, or such other period as the court may direct. The costs of providing that bundle shall be borne by the appellant initially, but will form part of the costs of the permission application.
| 4.17 | Where the appellant is in receipt of services funded by the Legal Services Commission (or legally aided) and permission to appeal has been refused by the appeal court without a hearing, the appellant must send a copy of the reasons the appeal court gave for refusing permission to the relevant office of the Legal Services Commission as soon as it has been received from the court. The court will require confirmation that this has been done if a hearing is requested to re-consider the question of permission. |
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Tanfern v Macdonald [20]. |
| 4.18 | Where a court under rule 52.3(7) gives permission to appeal on some issues only, it will –
|
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Tanfern v Macdonald [22]. |
| Paragraph 4.18 amended w/e from 2 December 2002. |
If the court reserves the question of permission under paragraph 4.18(2), the appellant must, within 14 days after service of the court's order, inform the appeal court and the respondent in writing whether he intends to pursue the reserved issues. If the appellant does intend to pursue the reserved issues, the parties must include in any time estimate for the appeal hearing, their time estimate for the reserved issues.
| Paragraph 4.19 amended w/e from 2 December 2002. |
If the appeal court refuses permission to appeal on the remaining issues without a hearing and the applicant wishes to have that decision reconsidered at an oral hearing, the time limit in rule 52.3(5) shall apply. Any application for an extension of this time limit should be made promptly. The court hearing the appeal on the issues for which permission has been granted will not normally grant, at the appeal hearing, an application to extend the time limit in rule 52.3(5) for the remaining issues.
| Paragraph 4.20 inserted w/e from 2 December 2002. |
If the appeal court refuses permission to appeal on remaining issues at or after an oral hearing, the application for permission to appeal on those issues cannot be renewed at the appeal hearing. See section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999.
| Paragraph 4.21 inserted w/e from 2 December 2002. |
| 4.22 | In most cases, applications for permission to appeal will be determined without the court requesting –
|
| Paragraph 4.22 inserted w/e from 2 December 2002. |
Where the court does not request submissions from or attendance by the respondent, costs will not normally be allowed to a respondent who volunteers submissions or attendance.
| Paragraph 4.23 inserted w/e from 2 December 2002. |
Where the court does request –
| (1) | submissions from; or |
| (2) | attendance by the respondent, the court will normally allow the respondent his costs if permission is refused. |
| Paragraph 4.24 inserted w/e from 2 December 2002. |
| 5.1 |
An appellant’s notice must be filed and served in all cases. Where an application for permission to appeal is made to the appeal court it must be applied for in the appellant's notice. |
| 5.1A |
|
| 5.1B | CPR rule 19.4A and the practice direction supplementing it shall apply as if references to the case management conference were to the application for permission to appeal. (The practice directionpdp-19to Part 19 provides for notice to be given and parties joined in certain circumstances to which this paragraph applies) |
| 5.2 | Where the time for filing an appellant's notice has expired, the appellant must –
The appellant’s notice should state the reason for the delay and the steps taken prior to the application being made. |
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Sayers v Clarke Walker [17], [19], Southern & District and Finance PLC v Turner [10]. |
| Para 5.2 substituted w/e from 6 April 2006. |
Where the appellant’s notice includes an application for an extension of time and permission to appeal has been given or is not required the respondent has the right to be heard on that application. He must be served with a copy of the appeal bundle (see paragraph 5.6A). However, a respondent who unreasonably opposes an extension of time runs the risk of being ordered to pay the appellant’s costs of that application.
| 5.4 | If an extension of time is given following such an application the procedure at paragraphs 6.1 to 6.6 applies. |
| 5.5 | Notice of an application to be made to the appeal court for a remedy incidental to the appeal (e.g. an interim remedy under rule 25.1 or an order for security for costs) may be included in the appeal notice or in a Part 23 application notice. |
(Rule 25.15 deals with security for costs of an appeal)
(Paragraph 11 of this practice direction contains other provisions relating to applications)
| 5.6 |
|
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Harvey Shopfitters Ltd v ADI Ltd [15], [15]. |
| (1) | An appellant must include in
his appeal bundle the following documents:
|
| (2) | All documents that are extraneous to the issues to be considered on the application or the appeal must be excluded. The appeal bundle may include affidavits, witness statements, summaries, experts’ reports and exhibits but only where these are directly relevant to the subject matter of the appeal. |
| (3) | Where the appellant is represented, the appeal bundle must contain a certificate signed by his solicitor, counsel or other representative to the effect that he has read and understood paragraph (2) above and that the composition of the appeal bundle complies with it. |
| 5.7 | Where it is not possible to file all the above documents, the appellant must indicate which documents have not yet been filed and the reasons why they are not currently available. The appellant must then provide a reasonable estimate of when the missing document or documents can be filed and file them as soon as reasonably practicable. |
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Harvey Shopfitters Ltd v ADI Ltd [14], [15]. |
| 5.8 |
|
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Harvey Shopfitters Ltd v ADI Ltd [14], [15], [15]. |
| Para 5.8(1A) of PD52 added w/e from 1 October 2005. |
| 5.9 |
|
| This Paragraph is referred to in: Haggis v DPP [26], [26], Harvey Shopfitters Ltd v ADI Ltd [22], [23]. |
| (1) | A skeleton argument must contain a numbered list of the points which the party wishes to make. These should both define and confine the areas of controversy. Each point should be stated as concisely as the nature of the case allows. |
| (2) | A numbered point must be followed by a reference to any document on which the party wishes to rely. |
| (3) | A skeleton argument must
state, in respect of each authority cited –
|
| (4) | If more than one authority is cited in support of a given proposition, the skeleton argument must briefly state the reason for taking that course. |
| (5) | The statement referred to in
sub-paragraph (4) should not materially add to the length of the skeleton
argument but should be sufficient to demonstrate, in the context of the
argument –
|
| (6) | The cost of preparing a
skeleton argument which –
|
