|
Failure to attend the trial
|
|
| 2.1 |
Rule 39.3 sets out the consequences of a party’s
failure to attend the trial. |
|
| 2.2 |
The court may proceed with a trial in the absence of a
party3. In
the absence of: |
| | (1)
| the defendant, the claimant may –|
| | (a)
| prove his claim at trial and obtain
judgment on his claim and for costs, and |
|
| | (b)
| seek the striking out of any
counterclaim, |
|
|
| | (2)
| the claimant, the defendant may –|
| | (a)
| prove any counterclaim at trial and obtain
judgment on his counterclaim and for costs, and |
|
| | (b)
| seek the striking out of the claim,
or |
|
|
| | (3)
| both parties, the court may strike out the whole
of the proceedings. |
|
|
| 2.3 |
Where the court has struck out proceedings, or any part
of them, on the failure of a party to attend, that party may apply in
accordance with Part 23 for the proceedings, or that part of them, to be
restored and for any judgment given against that party to be set aside4. |
|
| 2.4 |
The application referred to in paragraph 2.3 above must
be supported by evidence giving reasons for the failure to attend court and
stating when the applicant found out about the order against him. |

|
Bundles of documents for hearings or trial
|
|
| 3.1 |
Unless the court orders otherwise, the claimant must
file the trial bundle not more than 7 days and not less than 3 days before the
start of the trial. |
|
| 3.2 |
Unless the court orders otherwise, the trial bundle
should include a copy of:
|
| | (2)
| a case summary and/or chronology where
appropriate, |
|
| | (3)
| requests for further information and responses to
the requests, |
|
| | (4)
| all witness statements to be relied on as
evidence, |
|
| | (5)
| any witness summaries, |
|
| | (6)
| any notices of intention to rely on hearsay
evidence under rule 32.2, |
|
| | (7)
| any notices of intention to rely on evidence
(such as a plan, photograph etc.) under rule 33.6 which is not –|
| | (a)
| contained in a witness statement, affidavit
or experts report, |
|
| | (b)
| being given orally at trial, |
|
|
| | (8)
| any medical reports and responses to them, |
|
| | (9)
| any experts’ reports and responses to
them, |
|
| | (10)
| any order giving directions as to the conduct of
the trial, and |
|
| | (11)
| any other necessary documents. |
|
|
| 3.3 |
The originals of the documents contained in the trial
bundle, together with copies of any other court orders should be available at
the trial. |
|
| 3.4 |
The preparation and production of the trial bundle,
even where it is delegated to another person, is the responsibility of the
legal representative5 who
has conduct of the claim on behalf of the claimant. |
|
| 3.5 |
The trial bundle should be paginated (continuously)
throughout, and indexed with a description of each document and the page
number. Where the total number of pages is more than 100, numbered dividers
should be placed at intervals between groups of documents. |
|
| 3.6 |
The bundle should normally be contained in a ring
binder or lever arch file. Where more than one bundle is supplied, they should
be clearly distinguishable, for example, by different colours or letters. If
there are numerous bundles, a core bundle should be prepared containing the
core documents essential to the proceedings, with references to the
supplementary documents in the other bundles. |
|
| 3.7 |
For convenience, experts’ reports may be
contained in a separate bundle and cross referenced in the main bundle. |
|
| 3.8 |
If a document to be included in the trial bundle is
illegible, a typed copy should be included in the bundle next to it, suitably
cross-referenced. |
|
| 3.9 |
The contents of the trial bundle should be agreed where
possible. The parties should also agree where possible: |
| | (1)
| that the documents contained in the bundle are
authentic even if not disclosed under Part 31, and |
|
| | (2)
| that documents in the bundle
may be treated as evidence of the facts stated in them even if a notice under
the Civil Evidence Act 1995Acts has not been served. |
Where it is not possible to agree the contents of the
bundle, a summary of the points on which the parties are unable to agree should
be included. |
|
| 3.10 |
The party filing the trial bundle should supply
identical bundles to all the parties to the proceedings and for the use of the
witnesses. |

|
Settlement or discontinuance after the trial date is
fixed
|
|
| 4.1 |
Where: |
| | (1)
| an offer to settle a claim is accepted, |
|
| | (2)
| or a settlement is reached, or |
|
| | (3)
| a claim is discontinued, which disposes of the
whole of a claim for which a date or ‘window’ has been fixed for
the trial, the parties must ensure that the listing officer for the trial court
is notified immediately. |
|
|
| 4.2 |
If an order is drawn up giving effect to the settlement
or discontinuance, a copy of the sealed order should be filed with the listing
officer. |
|
Representation at hearings
|
|
| 5.1 |
At any hearing, a written statement containing the
following information should be provided for the court: |
| | (1)
| the name and address of each advocate, |
|
| | (2)
| his qualification or entitlement to act as an
advocate, and |
|
| | (3)
| the party for whom he so acts. |
|
|
| 5.2 |
Where a party is a company or other corporation and is
to be represented at a hearing by an employee the written statement should
contain the following additional information: |
| | (1)
| The full name of the company or corporation as
stated in its certificate of registration. |
|
| | (2)
| The registered number of the company or
corporation. |
|
| | (3)
| The position or office in the company or
corporation held by the representative. |
|
| | (4)
| The date on which and manner in which the
representative was authorised to act for the company or corporation, e.g.
________ 19____: written authority from managing director; or ________ 19____:
Board resolution dated ________ 19____ . |
|
|
| 5.3 |
Rule 39.6 is intended to enable a company or other
corporation to represent itself as a litigant in person. Permission under rule
39.6(b) should therefore be given by the court unless there is some particular
and sufficient reason why it should be withheld. In considering whether to
grant permission the matters to be taken into account include the complexity of
the issues and the experience and position in the company or corporation of the
proposed representative. |
|
| 5.4 |
Permission under rule 39.6(b) should be obtained in
advance of the hearing from, preferably, the judge who is to hear the case, but
may, if it is for any reason impracticable or inconvenient to do so, be
obtained from any judge by whom the case could be heard. |
|
| 5.5 |
The permission may be obtained informally and without
notice to the other parties. The judge who gives the permission should record
in writing that he has done so and supply a copy to the company or corporation
in question and to any other party who asks for one. |
|
| 5.6 |
Permission should not normally be granted under Rule
39.6:
|
| | (b)
| in contempt proceedings. |
|
|

|
CITATION OF
AUTHORITIES HUMAN RIGHTS
|
|
| 8.1 |
If it is necessary for a party to give evidence at a
hearing of an authority referred to in section 2 of the Human Rights Act 1998
– |
| | (1)
| the authority to be cited should be an
authoritative and complete report; and |
|
| | (2)
| the party must give to the court and any other
party a list of the authorities he intends to cite and copies of the reports
not less than three days before the hearing. (Section 2(1) of the Human Rights
Act 1998 requires the court to take into account the authorities listed
there) |
|
|
| | (3)
| Copies of the complete original texts issued by
the European Court and Commission either paper based or from the Court’s
judgment database (HUDOC), which is available on the Internet, may be
used. |
|