See also Part 3, Practice Direction 3, Practice Direction 3B, Practice Direction 3C
PRACTICE DIRECTION – MESOTHELIOMA CLAIMS
This Practice Direction supplements CPR, rule 3.1
| 2 |
In this Practice Direction – ‘show cause procedure’ means (without prejudice to the court’s general case management powers in Part 3 of the CPR) the procedure set out in paragraph 6; ‘outline submissions showing cause’ means an outline or skeleton argument of the defendant's case within the show cause procedure; and ‘standard interim payment’ means the standard payment in respect of interim damages, and (if appropriate) interim costs and disbursements as determined from time to time by the Head of Civil Justice. The amount of this payment is currently £50,000. |
| Text inserted in paragraph 2 w/e from 1 October 2008, Text substituted in paragraph 2 w/e from 1 October 2008. |
| 3.1 |
The claim form and every statement of case must be marked with the title ‘Living Mesothelioma Claim’ or ‘Fatal Mesothelioma Claim’ as appropriate. |
| 3.2 |
In order for the court to adopt the show cause procedure in the first case management conference, the claimant must file and serve any witness statements about liability (as are available) –
|
| 3.3 |
Any witness statement about liability must identify as far as is possible –
|
| 3.4 |
The claimant must also attach to the claim form –
|
| 4.1 |
Where the claimant believes that the claim is particularly urgent then on issue of the claim form, the claimant –
|
| 4.2 |
Where the court decides that the claim is urgent (and notwithstanding that a claim has not yet been served or a defence has not yet been filed) it will –
|
| 5.1 |
Where paragraph 4 does not apply and –
the court file will be referred to a judge nominated to manage such cases and the judge will give directions for the date of the case management conference. |
| 5.2 |
Claims marked ‘Living Mesothelioma Claim’ will be given priority when fixing a case management conference. |
| 6.1 |
The show cause procedure is a requirement by the court, of its own initiative and usually on a ‘costs in the case’ basis, for the defendant to identify the evidence and legal arguments that give the defendant a real prospect of success on any or all issues of liability. The court will use this procedure for the resolution of mesothelioma claims. |
| 6.2 |
At the first case management conference, unless there is good reason not to do so, the defendant should be prepared to show cause why –
|
| 6.3 |
At the first case management conference if liability remains in issue the court will normally order that the defendant show cause within a further given period. |
| 6.4 |
The order requiring the defendant to show cause within a further given period will direct –
|
| 6.5 |
At the first case management conference the court will –
|
| 6.6 |
Where the defendant fails to show cause on some issues, the court will normally enter judgment on those issues. |
| 6.7 |
Where the defendant fails to show cause on all issues, the court will enter judgment for a sum to be determined and will normally order that a standard interim payment be made. |
| Text inserted in paragraph 6.7 w/e from 1 October 2008, Text omitted in paragraph 6.7 w/e from 1 October 2008. |
Where the defendant succeeds in showing cause on some or all issues, the court will order a trial of those issues. The court may also require the issue of quantum or apportionment (as appropriate) to be dealt with at the trial provided that it does not delay the date for the fixing of the trial.
| 7.1 |
In Living Mesothelioma Claims the date of the determination of damages or the trial will generally not be more than 16 weeks following service of the claim form. |
| 7.2 |
In Fatal Mesothelioma Claims the hearing date may be more than 16 weeks following service of the claim form. |
| 8. |
Any party who for good reason wishes evidence to be taken by deposition may apply to the court at any time for such an order. However, the court will normally expect that such a request is made at a case management conference. The order will include a direction for the recording of such evidence on DVD and for the provision of a transcript. The parties must also be prepared to arrange for the provision of equipment to view the DVD by the court. (Part 34 contains provisions for evidence to be taken by deposition.) |
| 9. |
In Living Mesothelioma Claims the court may decide not to require strict adherence to Practice Direction (Pre-Action Conduct) and any relevant pre-action protocol. |
| Text substituted in paragraph 9 w/e from 6 April 2009. |
