See also Part
3, Practice Direction 3, Practice Direction
3B, Practice Direction
3C
PRACTICE DIRECTION
– MESOTHELIOMA CLAIMS
This Practice Direction
supplements CPR, rule 3.1
|
Scope
|
|
| 1 |
This Practice Direction applies to claims for
compensation for mesothelioma. |
|
Definitions
|
|
| 2 |
In this Practice Direction – ‘show cause procedure’ means (without
prejudice to the court’s general case management powers in Part 3 of the
CPR) the procedure set out in paragraph 6; ‘outline
submissions showing cause’ means an outline or skeleton argument of the
defendant's case within the show cause procedure;
and ‘standard interim payment’ means the standard payment
in respect of interim damages,
and (if appropriate) interim costs and disbursements as determined from time to
time by the Head of Civil Justice. The
amount of this payment is currently £50,000. |
Text inserted in paragraph 2 w/e from 1 October 2008, Text substituted in paragraph 2 w/e from 1 October 2008. |
|
Starting proceedings
|
|
| 3.1 |
The claim form and every statement of case must be
marked with the title ‘Living Mesothelioma Claim’ or ‘Fatal
Mesothelioma Claim’ as appropriate. |
|
| 3.2 |
In order for the court to adopt the show cause
procedure in the first case management conference, the claimant must file and
serve any witness statements about liability (as are available) – |
| | (1)
| either –|
| | (a)
| at the same time as
filing and serving the claim form and (where appropriate) the particulars of
claim; or |
|
| | (b)
| as soon as possible after
filing and serving the claim form and (where appropriate) the particulars of
claim; and |
|
|
| | (2)
| in any event not less than 7
days before the case management conference. |
|
|
| 3.3 |
Any witness statement about liability must identify as
far as is possible – |
| | (1)
| the alleged victim's employment
history and history of exposure to asbestos; |
|
| | (2)
| the identity of any employer
where exposure to asbestos of the alleged victim is alleged; |
|
| | (3)
| details of any self employment
in which the alleged victim may have been exposed; and |
|
| | (4)
| details of all claims made and
payments received under the Pneumoconiosis etc. (Workers' Compensation) Act
1979. |
|
|
| 3.4 |
The claimant must also attach to the claim form – |
| | (1)
| a work history from H M Revenue
and Customs (where available); and |
|
| | (2)
| any pre-action letter of
claim. |
|

|
Claimants with severely limited life expectancy
|
|
| 4.1 |
Where the claimant believes that the claim is
particularly urgent then on issue of the claim form, the claimant
– |
| | (1)
| may request in writing that the
court file is placed immediately before a judge nominated to manage such cases
in order to fix a case management conference; and |
|
| | (2)
| must explain in writing to the
court why the claim is urgent. |
|
|
| 4.2 |
Where the court decides that the claim is urgent (and
notwithstanding that a claim has not yet been served or a defence has not yet
been filed) it will – |
| | (1)
| fix the date for the case
management conference to take place within a short period of time;
and |
|
| | (2)
| give directions as to the date
by which the claimant must serve the claim form if it has not been served
already. |
|
|
Fixing the case management conference for other claims
|
|
| 5.1 |
Where paragraph 4 does not apply and – |
| | (1)
| a defence is filed by the
defendant or one of the defendants (where there is more than one);
or |
|
| | (2)
| the claimant has obtained a
default judgment, |
the court file will be referred to a judge
nominated to manage such cases and the judge will give directions for the date
of the case management conference. |
|
| 5.2 |
Claims marked ‘Living Mesothelioma Claim’
will be given priority when fixing a case management conference. |
|
The show cause procedure
|
|
| 6.1 |
The show cause procedure is a requirement by the court,
of its own initiative and usually on a ‘costs in the case’ basis,
for the defendant to identify the evidence and legal arguments that give the
defendant a real prospect of success on any or all issues of liability. The
court will use this procedure for the resolution of mesothelioma claims. |
|
| 6.2 |
At the first case management conference, unless there
is good reason not to do so, the defendant should be prepared to show cause why
– |
| | (1)
| a judgment on liability should
not be entered against the defendant; and |
|
| | (2)
| a standard interim payment on
account of damages and (if appropriate) costs and disbursements should not be
made by the defendant by a specified date. |
|
|
| 6.3 |
At the first case management conference if liability
remains in issue the court will normally order that the defendant show cause
within a further given period. |
|
| 6.4 |
The order requiring the defendant to show cause within
a further given period will direct – |
| | (1)
| that the defendant file and
serve on the claimant by a specified date outline submissions showing cause and
–|
| | (a)
| if the outline
submissions are not filed and served by a specified date, judgment, for a sum
to be determined by the court, will be entered against the defendant without
the need for any further order and the defendant will be ordered to make a
standard interim payment by a specified date; or |
|
| | (b)
| if the outline
submissions are filed and served by the specified date, the claim will be
listed for a show cause hearing; or |
|
|
| | (2)
| that the defendant show cause
at a hearing on a date fixed by the court. |
|
|
| 6.5 |
At the first case management conference the court will
– |
| | (1)
| fix the date or trial window
for the determination of damages and give any other case management directions
as appropriate where the defendant admits liability or judgment is
entered; |
|
| | (2)
| fix the date or trial window
for the determination of damages and give any other case management directions
as appropriate where an order to show cause under paragraph 6.3 has been made
(if the defendant subsequently shows cause then the determination date or trial
window may be utilised for the trial of any issue); or |
|
| | (3)
| in cases in which there is to
be a trial on liability, give directions including the date or window for the
trial. |
|
|
| 6.6 |
Where the defendant fails to show cause on some issues,
the court will normally enter judgment on those issues. |
|
| 6.7 |
Where the defendant fails to show cause on all issues,
the court will enter judgment for a sum to be determined and will
normally order that a standard
interim payment
be
made. |
|
Text inserted in paragraph 6.7 w/e from 1 October 2008, Text omitted in paragraph 6.7 w/e from 1 October 2008. |
6.8 |
Where the defendant succeeds in showing cause on some
or all issues, the court will order a trial of those issues. The court may also
require the issue of quantum or apportionment (as appropriate) to be dealt with
at the trial provided that it does not delay the date for the fixing of the
trial. |

|
Setting the trial date
|
|
| 7.1 |
In Living Mesothelioma Claims the date of the
determination of damages or the trial will generally not be more than 16 weeks
following service of the claim form. |
|
| 7.2 |
In Fatal Mesothelioma Claims the hearing date may be
more than 16 weeks following service of the claim form. |
|
Taking evidence by deposition
|
|
| 8. |
Any party who for good reason wishes evidence to be
taken by deposition may apply to the court at any time for such an order.
However, the court will normally expect that such a request is made at a case
management conference. The order will include a direction for the recording of
such evidence on DVD and for the provision of a transcript. The parties must
also be prepared to arrange for the provision of equipment to view the DVD by
the court. (Part 34 contains provisions for evidence to be taken
by deposition.) |
|
Compliance with pre-action protocols
|
|
| 9. |
In Living Mesothelioma Claims the court may decide not
to require strict adherence to any relevant pre-action protocol. |