Main Menu for Table of Cases
Previous part of this Table of Cases

Cabassi v Vila:

Darker (Formerly Head) v Chief Constable of The West Midlands Police, [38], [62].

Cadby v Martinex:

Mannai Investment Co. Ltd v Eagle Star Assurance Co. Ltd, [54], [54], [82].

Cadby v Martinez:

Mannai Investment Co. Ltd v Eagle Star Assurance Co. Ltd, [7], [16], [32], [33], [53], [54], [67], [82].

Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Alfred McAlpine Homes (East) Ltd (No 2&rparen:

Redrow Homes Ltd v Bett Brothers Plc , [5], [5], [13], [18].

Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Alfred McAlpine Homes (East) Ltd (No2&rparen:

Redrow Homes Ltd v Bett Brothers Plc , [23].

Calder v Roundtree Mackintosh Confectionary Ltd:

Strathclyde Regional Council v Wallace , [22].

Calderbank v Calderbank:

O'Neill v Phillips, [56], [56].

Caledonian Railway Co v Ogilvy:

Wildtree Hotels Ltd v London Borough of Harrow, [44].

Caledonian Railway Co v Walker's Trustees:

Wildtree Hotels Ltd v London Borough of Harrow, [27], [44], [46].

Calveley v Chief Constable of the Merseyside Police:

Phelps v London Borough of Hillingdon, [41].

Waters v Commissioner of Police For The Metropolis, [15], [19], [22], [22], [45], [46], [50], [50], [51].

Gregory v Portsmouth City Council, [25], [25], [38].

Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England, [14].

Calveley v The Chief Constable of Merseyside:

Waters v Commissioner of Police For The Metropolis, [32].

Calveley v The Chief Constable of the Merseyside Police:

Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England, [158].

Calvin v Carr:

Boddington v British Transport Police, [54].

Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather Plc:

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd, [114].

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd, [133].

Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather Plc:

London Borough of Southwark v Mills, [28], [53].

Campbell & Stewart v Campbell:

Clydesdale Bank Plc. v Davidson, [34].

Campbell v Spottiswoode:

Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd, [9].

Campbell v Tyson:

Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd, [15].

Campbell v United Kingdom:

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex Parte Simms, [69].

Campbell v West of Scotland Shipbreaking Co:

Girvan v Inverness Farmers Dairy, [27].

Campbell v Wood:

Anthony Nevada Johnson v. The State, [3].

Camplin i:

R v Smith, [25].

Camplion:

R v Smith, [135].

Canada (Attorney-General) v Ward:

Horvath v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [7], [20], [41], [61], [81].

Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) v Mayers:

Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [87].

Canada Trust Co v Stolzenberg (No 2&rparen:

Canada Trust Company v Stolzenberg, [5].

Candlewood Navigation Corporation Ltd v Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd:

Macfarlane v Tayside Health Board, [115].

Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman:

Phelps v London Borough of Hillingdon, [45], [132].

Waters v Commissioner of Police For The Metropolis, [14].

W1-6 v Essex County Council, [19].

Barret v London Borough of Enfield, [4], [18], [35], [42], [48], [54], [71].

Commissioners of Police for the Metropolis v Reeves, [100].

Macfarlane v Tayside Health Board, [45], [113], [113], [113], [116].

Platform Home Loans Ltd v Oyston Shipways Ltd, [51].

White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, [105].

Cape Brandy Syndicate v Inland Revenue Commissioners:

Commissioners of Inland Revenue v McGuckian, [29].

Capital & Counties Plc v Hampshire CC:

Phelps v London Borough of Hillingdon, [135].

Capital & Counties Plc v Hampshire County Council:

Phelps v London Borough of Hillingdon, [48].

Capital Counties Plc v Hampshire County Council:

Barret v London Borough of Enfield, [75].

Carbonari v Università degli studi di Bologna:

Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England, [109], [110].

Card Protection:

Trustees of the Nell Gwynn House Maintenance Fund v Commissioners of Customs and Excise, [57].

Card Protection Plan Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise:

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v British Telecommunications Plc, [38], [41].

Card Protection Plan v Commissioners of Customs & Excise:

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v British Telecommunications Plc, [26].

Card Protection Plan v Customs & Excise Commissioners:

Commissioners of Customs and Excise v British Telecommunications Plc, [45].

Cardinal Williams v The Queen:

Presidential Insurance Company Limited v. Molly Hosein Stafford, [5].

Carega Properties SA v Sharratt:

Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd, [55], [56], [56], [56], [56], [56], [80], [81], [112], [112], [115], [124], [131], [162], [169].

Carega Properties v Sharratt:

Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd, [158].

Carindale Country Club Estate Pty Ltd v Astill:

Prince Jefri Bolkiah v K.P.M.G (A Firm), [45].

Carlton-Reid:

Earl Pratt and Ivan Morgan v. The Attorney General for Jamaica and The Superintendent of Prisons, Saint Catherine's, Jamaica, [99].

Carmarthenshire County Council v Lewis:

Barret v London Borough of Enfield, [62].

Carmichael v Caledonian Railway Co:

Wisely v John Fulton Plumbers Ltd, [7], [9], [38].

Carmichael v Carmichael's Executrix:

Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd, [50].

Carnival Cruise Lines Inc v Sitmar Cruises Ltd:

, [10].

Carradine Properties Ltd v Aslam:

Mannai Investment Co. Ltd v Eagle Star Assurance Co. Ltd, [16], [21], [21], [21], [24], [36], [38], [39], [59], [82], [90], [91], [95], [96], [100].

Carrega Properties SA v Sharratt:

Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd, [16], [18], [24].

Carrigan v Duncan:

Jameson v Central Electricity Generating Board, [4], [18], [42], [43], [75], [76].

Carse v Coppen:

Sharp v Woolwich Building Society, [8], [37].

Carstairs v Taylor:

London Borough of Southwark v Mills, [37].

Carver's Carriage by Sea:

Effort Shipping Company Ltd v Linden Management SA, [37], [39].

Case 362/89 D'Urso:

British Fuels Ltd v Baxendale, [60], [62].

Case C-399/92 Stadt Lengerich v Helmig:

Barry v Midland Bank Plc., [8], [13], [27], [35], [58].

Casey v HM Advocate:

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Pierson, [139].

Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome (No 2&rparen:

In re Pinochet, [31].

Cassidy v Ministry of Health:

Phelps v London Borough of Hillingdon, [145].

Castells v Spain:

Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd, [91].

Castle v Cross:

DP v McKeown, [9].

Castorina v Chief Constable of Surrey:

O'Hara v Chief Constable of the R.U.C., [38].

Catholic Commission for Justice & Peace in Zimbabwe v Attorney-General:

Earl Pratt and Ivan Morgan v. The Attorney General for Jamaica and The Superintendent of Prisons, Saint Catherine's, Jamaica, [80].

Catholic Commission for Justice & Peace in Zimbabwe v The Attorney General:

Earl Pratt and Ivan Morgan v. The Attorney General for Jamaica and The Superintendent of Prisons, Saint Catherine's, Jamaica, [74].

Causing:

Empress Car Company (Abertillery) Ltd v National Rivers Authority, [16].

Cayara Case, (Preliminary Objections&rparen:

Vekaplast Windows (C.I.) Limited v. Barry Kenneth Jehan and Lesley Jehan, [35], [37].

CBS Songs Ltd v Amstrad Consumer Electronics Plc:

Credit Lyonnais Nederland NV v Export Credits Guarantee Department, [42].

CEC v Wellington Hospital:

Trustees of the Nell Gwynn House Maintenance Fund v Commissioners of Customs and Excise, [42].

Cella, The :

Republic of India v India Steamship Company Ltd, [29].

Cemp Properties (UK) Ltd v Dentsply Research & Development Corporation:

Smith New Court Securities v Scrimgeour Vickers, [74].

Centre public d'aide sociale de Courcelles v Lebon:

Chief Adjudication Officer v Wolke Remilien v Secretary of State for Social Security, [32], [62].

CES v Superclinics (Ausralia) Pty Ltd:

Macfarlane v Tayside Health Board, [33].

CES v Superclinics (Australia) Pty Ltd:

Macfarlane v Tayside Health Board, [68], [113], [173], [176], [179].

Chadha v Dow Jones & Co Inc:

Berezovsky v Michaels, [68].

Chadwick v British Railways Board:

White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, [14], [67], [68], [68], [82], [82], [87], [91], [91], [125], [126], [149], [150], [152], [153], [153], [153].

Chambers:

In Re Ellis, [54].

Champagne v United States of America:

Commissioners of Police for the Metropolis v Reeves, [42], [70].

Chan v Canada:

Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [86].

Chan v Minister of Employment & Immigration:

Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [19], [85].

Chan Wai-keung v Reg:

Mrs. Jennifer Ann Balfour v. The Occupational Therapists Board, [11].

Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen:

R v Powell, [7], [8], [41], [42], [43], [43], [49], [51], [52], [61], [71], [73], [80], [81].

Teiko David Jamel Furbert and Sheldon Eugenio Franks v. The Queen, [54].

Pauline Eunice Tangiora v. Wellington District Legal Services Committee, [9].

Grape Bay Limited v. The Attorney General, [44].

Chan Wing-Sui v The Queen:

R v Powell, [14], [63], [74].

Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs:

Horvath v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [20].

Main Menu for Table of Cases
Next part of this Table of Cases