Main Menu for Table of Cases
Previous part of this Table of Cases
Hunter v Fox:
       Axis West Developments Ltd v Chartwell Land Investments Ltd, [29].
Huntington v Attrill:
       R v Martin, [53].
Hurd v Jones:
       R v Chief Constable of Sussex EX Parte International Trader's Ferry Ltd, [93].
Hurtado v State of California:
       Cletus Timothy, Dexter Reid and Sheldon Lewis v. The State, [74], [74].
Hussain v New Taplow Paper Mills Ltd:
       Page v Sheerness Steel Company, [86].
       Longden v British Coal Corporation, [15].
Hussain v United Kingdom:
       R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex Parte Stafford, [14].
       Dean Tillett v. The Queen, [10].
Hussien v Chong Fook Kam:
       R v DPP, Ex Parte Kebeline, [108].
       O'Hara v Chief Constable of the R.U.C., [14], [14].
Hutchinson v London & North Eastern Railway Co:
       Commissioners of Police for the Metropolis v Reeves, [23], [68].
Hyam v DPP:
       Attorney General's Reference No. 3 of 1994, [17], [31], [38].
Hyams v:
       Helga Stoeckert v. Margie Geddes, [6].
Hyde v Thameside Area Health Authority:
       Commissioners of Police for the Metropolis v Reeves, [27].
Hydro Electric Commission of the Township of Nepean v Ontario Hydro:
       Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council, [43], [149], [171], [172].
Hydro-Electric Commission of the Township of Nepean v Ontario Hydro:
       Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council, [147].  
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd v Papadopoulos:
       Stocznia Gdanska S.A. v Latvian Shipping Co., [32], [32], [32], [36], [39], [44], [44], [79], [81], [85].


I

I Congreso Del Partido:
       Holland v Lampen-Wolfe, [14], [14], [16], [16], [16], [32], [35], [35], [45].
I Congresso del Partido:
       R v Bartle, Ex Parte Pinochet, [198].
       R v Bartle EX Parte Pinochet, [55].
IBL Ltd v Coussens:
       Smith New Court Securities v Scrimgeour Vickers, [19].
Ibrahim v R:
       (Consolidated Appeals) Lutchmeeparsad Badry v. The Director of Public Prosecutions, [19], [28], [31], [33].
Ibrahim v The King:
       S. Buxoo and Another v. The Queen, [5].
Identifying the recipient of the services:
       Commissioners of Customs and Excise v Redrow Group Plc, [37].
If before this happens he contravenes the byelaw, he commits an offence & can be punished:
       R v Wicks, [18].
If the defendant does an act with the intention of causing a particular kind of harm to B, & unintentionally does that kind of harm to V, then the intent to harm B may be added to the harm actually done to V in deciding whether the defendant has committed a crime towards V:
       Attorney General's Reference No. 3 of 1994, [17].
ILC Draft Code of Crimes Against Peace:
       R v Bartle, Ex Parte Pinochet, [38].
Imbler v Pachtman:
       Darker (Formerly Head) v Chief Constable of The West Midlands Police, [30], [45].
       Arthur J.S Hall and Co. v Simons, [215], [253].
Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v Shatwell:
       Commissioners of Police for the Metropolis v Reeves, [104].
Imperial Gas Light & Coke Co v Broadbent:
       Wildtree Hotels Ltd v London Borough of Harrow, [14].
Imperial Group Pension Trust Ltd v Imperial Tobacco Ltd:
       Malik v Bank of Credit, [60].
Impress (Worcester) Ltd v Rees:
       Empress Car Company (Abertillery) Ltd v National Rivers Authority, [29], [31], [32], [41].
In Addlestone Linoleum Co:
       Soden v British & Commonwealth Holdings Plc., [9], [15], [16], [20], [21], [22], [22], [24].
In any event:
       Hutchison Reid v Secretary of State for Scotland, [113].
in Attorney-General of Hong Kong v Lee Kwong-kut:
       R v DPP, Ex Parte Kebeline, [62], [71], [105], [106], [120], [152].
in Jones v Berkshire Area Health Authority:
       Macfarlane v Tayside Health Board, [66], [71], [102].
In other countries:
       Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd, [31].
in R v Maughan:
       B v Director of Public Prosecutions, [29], [30], [32], [60].
In re A & C Supplies Ltd:
       Dharmarajen Sabapathee v. The State, [19].
In re A (An infant&rparen:
       In Re B (A Minor), [12].
In re A (Minors) (Abduction: Custody Rights&rparen:
       In re H (Minors), [16], [23], [25], [26].
In re A Co:
       O'Neill v Phillips, [28].
In re A Co (No 006834 of 1988&rparen:
       O'Neill v Phillips, [46].
In re A Debtor (No 627 of 1936&rparen:
       Morris v Rayners Enterprises Incorporated, [31].
In re A Z (A Minor) (Abduction: Acquiescence&rparen:
       In re H (Minors), [16], [25], [39].
In re Acosta:
       Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [17], [17], [19], [21], [22], [22], [22], [25], [27], [46], [73], [83].
In re Arton (No 2&rparen:
       In Re Burke, [39].
In re Astec (BSR) Plc:
       O'Neill v Phillips, [31].
In re Atkinson’s Will Trusts:
       The Attorney-General of the Cayman Islands (Third ) and Others v. Even Wahr-Hansen, [22].
In re B (Change of Surname&rparen:
       Dawson v Wearmouth, [21].
In re B-M (Wardship: Jurisdiction&rparen:
       In re S (A Minor) (1997), [25], [28], [50], [51].
In re Bank of Credit & Commerce International SA (No 10&rparen:
       Morris v Rayners Enterprises Incorporated, [13].
In re C:
       R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex Parte Adan, [34].
In re C (Change of Surname&rparen:
       Dawson v Wearmouth, [41].
In re Caxton Decd:
       Connelly v R.T.Z. Corporation Plc, [16].
In re Charge Card Services Ltd:
       Morris v Rayners Enterprises Incorporated, [22], [27].
In re Cochrane:
       Ingram v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, [38].
In re Corbenstoke Ltd (No2&rparen:
       Dharmarajen Sabapathee v. The State, [21].
In re Dale & Plant Ltd:
       Soden v British & Commonwealth Holdings Plc., [14].
In re De Falbe:
       Elitestone Ltd v Morris, [32], [37], [46].
In re Dillet:
       S. Buxoo and Another v. The Queen, [5], [6].
In Re Diplock:
       Foskett v McKeown, [10].
In re Diplock:
       Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council, [79], [80].
In re Diplock's Estate:
       Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council, [136], [185].
In re Downshire Settled Estates:
       Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council, [21].
In re Drew (A Bankrupt&rparen:
       Cadogan Estates Limited v. McMahon (A.P.), [3], [27], [27], [30], [41], [63], [63].
In re Eichholz:
       Cardinal Williams v. The Queen, [27].
In re Ellenborough Park:
       DPP v Jones, [68], [107].
In re Evans Sons, Lescher & Webb Ltd:
       , [10].
In Re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation&rparen:
       In re L (By His Next Friend GE), [59], [59].
In re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation&rparen:
       In re L (By His Next Friend GE), [25], [37], [37].
In re Findlay:
       R v Minister of Defence, Ex Parte Walker, [48].
       R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Pierson, [5], [6], [26], [30], [41], [64], [73], [73], [76], [77], [77], [77], [135], [137].
       R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte V and T., [74], [84], [111], [141], [142].
In re Findlay, In re Hogben:
       R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex Parte Hindley, [25], [25], [37].
In re Fish:
       Mannai Investment Co. Ltd v Eagle Star Assurance Co. Ltd, [79], [84].
In re Former Syrian Ambassador to the German Democratic Republic:
       R v Bartle, Ex Parte Pinochet, [238].
In re Foseco International Ltd's Patent:
       Canada Trust Company v Stolzenberg, [88].
In re G (A Minor)(Care Order: Threshold Conditions&rparen:
       Lancashire County Council v Barlow, [11], [27].
In re Gilligan:
       R v Manchester Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex Parte Granada Television Ltd, [15].
In re H (Minors) (Abduction: Custody Rights&rparen:
       In re H (Minors), [21].
       In re S (A Minor) (1997), [34], [46], [48].
In re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof&rparen:
       Lancashire County Council v Barlow, [5].
       Smith New Court Securities v Scrimgeour Vickers, [48].
In re H R Harmer:
       O'Neill v Phillips, [38].
In re Habeas Corpus Application of Carthage Healy:
       R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Launder, [102], [104].
In re Habeas Corpus Application of Navinder Singh Virdee:
       R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Launder, [102].
In re Hallett's Estate:
       Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council, [50].
In re Hallett's Estate; Knatchbull v Hallett:
       Foskett v McKeown, [73].
Main Menu for Table of Cases
Next part of this Table of Cases