Main Menu for Table of Cases
Previous part of this Table of Cases

Hewitt v West's Gas Improvement Co:

Girvan v Inverness Farmers Dairy, [24], [27], [30].

Heyman v Darwins Ltd:

Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd, [49].

Hurst v Bryk, [28].

HI v MG:

In Re H (A Minor) (1999), [15].

Hickey v Zezulka:

Commissioners of Police for the Metropolis v Reeves, [16], [42].

Hickey v Zezulka, (1992&rparen:

Commissioners of Police for the Metropolis v Reeves, [67], [70], [70].

Hickey v Zuzulka:

Commissioners of Police for the Metropolis v Reeves, [22].

Hickman v Group Health Plan, Inc:

Macfarlane v Tayside Health Board, [108].

Hickman v Maisey:

DPP v Jones, [24], [26], [31], [59], [98].

DPP v Jones, [121], [121], [122], [152], [155], [172].

Hicks v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police:

White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, [135].

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd, [96].

Higgins v Assessor for Lanarkshire:

Clydesdale Bank Plc. v Davidson, [40].

Higgs v Minister of National Security:

Dr. Tushar Kanti Bhadra v. The General Medical Council, [105], [109], [122], [149], [149], [151], [152], [152], [152].

Highland Railway Co v Balderston (Surveyor of Taxes&rparen:

Auckland Gas Co. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Inland Revenue, [22].

Hilao v Marcos:

R v Bartle EX Parte Pinochet, [138].

Hiley v Peoples Prudential Assurance Co Ltd:

Morris v Rayners Enterprises Incorporated, [29].

Hill v:

R v DPP, Ex Parte Kebeline, [82].

Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire:

Darker (Formerly Head) v Chief Constable of The West Midlands Police, [12].

Waters v Commissioner of Police For The Metropolis, [15], [31], [45], [52].

Barret v London Borough of Enfield, [11].

Taylor v Director of the Serious Fraud Office , [67], [68].

Ashoke Papan v. The State, [22].

Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto:

Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd, [34].

Hill v Revenue Commissioners:

Barry v Midland Bank Plc., [33].

Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd:

Christopher Moran Holdings Ltd v Bairstow, [6], [26], [26].

Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council, [97].

Hinds v The Queen:

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte V and T., [194].

Cletus Timothy, Dexter Reid and Sheldon Lewis v. The State, [68].

Hinds v The Queen, supra:

Dean Tillett v. The Queen, [5], [10].

Hinklebein v Craig:

Sharp v Woolwich Building Society, [49].

Hinz v Berry:

White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, [103].

Hirst & Agu v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire:

DPP v Jones, [36], [73], [112].

DPP v Jones, [141], [159], [162], [169], [176].

historical perspective, The :

Republic of India v India Steamship Company Ltd, [13].

Hitchman v Crouch Butler Savage Associates:

Hurst v Bryk, [32].

HJ Glawe Speil-und Unterhaltungsgerate Aufstellungsgesellsdraft mbtt & Co KG v Finanzamt Hamburg-Barmbek-Uhlenhorst:

Trustees of the Nell Gwynn House Maintenance Fund v Commissioners of Customs and Excise, [30].

HM Adv v Robert:

R v Smith, [201].

Hobbs v Marlowe:

Banque Financière De La Cité v Parc (Battersea) Ltd, [23], [43].

Hobson v Goringe:

Elitestone Ltd v Morris, [45].

Hobson v Gorringe:

Elitestone Ltd v Morris, [24].

Hodge & Son v Monoghan:

Arthur J.S Hall and Co. v Simons, [15].

Hodgson v Trapp:

Wisely v John Fulton Plumbers Ltd, [16], [40], [52].

Page v Sheerness Steel Company, [8], [92], [106], [113], [123], [141], [167].

Longden v British Coal Corporation, [15].

Hoffmann v Krieg:

Sarrio S.A. v Kuwait Investment Authority, [15].

Hoffmann--La Roche & Co AG v Secretary of State for Trade & Industry:

Boddington v British Transport Police, [85].

Hogben v The United Kingdom:

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex Parte François , [23].

Hogg v Kirby:

A-G v Blake, [22].

Holden v Hardy:

Cletus Timothy, Dexter Reid and Sheldon Lewis v. The State, [74].

Holder v The Queen:

S. Buxoo and Another v. The Queen, [3].

Hole v Garnsey:

Society of Lloyd's v Robinson, [30].

Holland v Hodgson:

Elitestone Ltd v Morris, [17], [21], [24], [44].

Hollington v F Hewthorn & Co Ltd:

Arthur J.S Hall and Co. v Simons, [40].

Arthur J.S Hall and Co. v Simons, [142].

Hollywood Silver Fox Farm Ltd v Emmett:

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd, [142].

Holmes v Bangladesh Biman Corporation:

Fellowes or Herd v Clyde Helicopters Ltd, [5], [36], [36], [39], [55], [65].

Holmes v Director of Public Prosecutions:

R v Smith, [36], [38], [123], [130].

Holmes v DPP:

R v Smith, [104], [203].

Holmes v Gilman:

Foskett v McKeown, [74].

Holtby v Brigham & Cowan (Hull) Ltd:

Lubbe v Cape Plc, [47].

Home Office Circular No 89/1978:

R v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary Ex Parte Begley, [7].

Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd:

Barret v London Borough of Enfield, [99].

Home Office v Harman:

Taylor v Director of the Serious Fraud Office , [18].

Honeyman's Executors v Sharp:

Smith v Governor and Company of the Bank of Scotland, [24].

Hong Kong Caterers Ltd v Maxim’s Ltd:

, [8].

Hope v Secretary of State for the Environment:

City of Edinburgh Council v Secretary of State for Scotland , [58].

Horrocks v Lowe:

Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd, [15], [44], [123].

Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd, [168], [170], [182].

Horsler v Zorro:

Hurst v Bryk, [28].

Hosier & Dickinson Ltd v P & M Kaye Ltd:

Beaufort Developments (NI) Ltd v Gilbert-Ash NI Ltd, [64], [66], [73], [73], [74], [76].

Hosmer v Republic Iron & Steel Co:

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd, [125].

Hossack v General Dental Council:

Ramnath Harrilal (No. 2) v. The State, [36].

Houldsworth v City of Glasgow Bank:

Soden v British & Commonwealth Holdings Plc., [15], [17], [18], [19], [22], [24].

How the rule became established:

Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council, [36].

Howard Electric Ltd v AJ Mooney Ltd:

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd, [134].

Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd:

Equitable Life Assurance Society v Hyman, [35], [47].

Hubbard v Pitt:

DPP v Jones, [73].

DPP v Jones, [141], [157], [158], [159], [165].

Hucks v Cole:

Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority, [31].

Hudood:

Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, [2], [2].

Hudson v Cripps:

London Borough of Southwark v Mills, [64].

Hue v Whiteley:

R v Oxfordshire County Council Ex Parte Sunningwell Parish Council, [28], [35].

Hugh v National Coal Board:

Commissioners of Police for the Metropolis v Reeves, [68].

Hughes v Department of Health & Social Security:

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Pierson, [128].

Hughes v Lord Advocate:

Jolley v Sutton London Borough Council, [9], [14], [29], [31], [31], [37], [37], [37].

Commissioners of Police for the Metropolis v Reeves, [55].

Hui Chi-Ming v The Queen:

R v Martin, [26], [36], [86].

R v Powell, [8], [14], [43].

Pauline Eunice Tangiora v. Wellington District Legal Services Committee, [13].

Hui Chi-ming v The Queen:

R v DPP, Ex Parte Kebeline, [51].

Humphreys:

R v Z, [48].

Hunt v RM Douglas (Roofing) Ltd:

Nykredit Mortgage Bank Plc. v Edward Erdman Group Ltd, [30].

Hunt v Severs:

Dimond v Lovell, [49], [51].

Page v Sheerness Steel Company, [70], [73].

Hunter 'Solution, The :

Arthur J.S Hall and Co. v Simons, [37].

Hunter v British Coal Corporation:

W1-6 v Essex County Council, [16].

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd:

London Borough of Southwark v Mills, [66].

Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police:

Arthur J.S Hall and Co. v Simons, [38], [38], [39], [39], [41].

Darker (Formerly Head) v Chief Constable of The West Midlands Police, [42].

Arthur J.S Hall and Co. v Simons, [3], [6], [11], [13], [13], [13], [13], [13], [13], [54], [55], [60], [60], [140], [142], [144], [155], [156], [156], [161], [181], [194], [219], [221], [222], [222], [223], [233], [243], [243], [264], [294], [295], [298].

Hunter v Chief Constable of West Midlands:

Hamilton v Al Fayed, [38], [41], [46], [48].

Main Menu for Table of Cases
Next part of this Table of Cases