Main Menu for Table of Cases
Previous part of this Table of Cases

Department of Transport v Chris Smaller Transport Ltd:

Grovit v Doctor, [11], [28].

Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspaper Ltd:

Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd, [67].

Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers Ltd:

Holland v Lampen-Wolfe, [9].

DPP v Jones, [74], [114].

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex Parte Simms, [24], [33], [42].

Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd, [26], [81].

Dering v Earl of Winchelsea:

Hurst v Bryk, [49].

Derrick v Williams:

Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council, [15], [15], [56].

Description:

Alan Wibberley Building Ltd v Insley, [17].

Devi v Roy:

Gilrose Finance Limited v. Ellis Gould, [6].

, [18].

Devon Lumber Co Ltd v MacNeill:

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd, [36], [123].

Deweer v Belgium:

W, J v. and v. W Raewyn Anne Bell, [24].

Dews v National Coal Board:

Longden v British Coal Corporation, [22], [24].

Diamond v Sutton:

Berezovsky v Michaels, [27], [108].

Dickens:

R v Emmett, [8].

Dickson:

R v Bingham, [31].

Dictator, The :

Republic of India v India Steamship Company Ltd, [16], [16], [17], [18], [18], [18].

die Voraussetzungen für die Annahme einer endgültigen Rechtshängigkeit:

Canada Trust Company v Stolzenberg, [69], [69], [70], [76], [76], [76], [77].

Diego Cali & Figli Srl v Servizi Ecoloici Porto di Genova SpA (SEPG&rparen:

Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales v Commissioners of Customs and Excise, [16].

Dies v British & International Mining & Finance Corporation Ltd:

Stocznia Gdanska S.A. v Latvian Shipping Co., [39], [78].

Different kinds of harm:

White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, [102].

Dillenkofer:

Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England, [72].

Dillenkofer v Federal Republic of Germany:

R v Secretary of State for Transport, Ex Parte Factortame Ltd, [43].

Dillenkoffer v Federal Republic of Germany:

Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England, [68], [84], [85], [85], [90], [118].

Dillet:

(Consolidated Appeals) Lutchmeeparsad Badry v. The Director of Public Prosecutions, [19], [20].

Dillet's Case:

Ibrahim v. The King, [26].

Dillon v Napier, Shanks & Bell:

Jameson v Central Electricity Generating Board, [43].

Dimes v Grand Junction Canal:

In re Pinochet, [54].

Dimes v Proprietors of Grand Junction Canal:

In re Pinochet, [37], [38], [54], [57], [63], [64], [75], [77], [77].

Din (Taj) v Wandsworth London Borough Council:

R v London Borough of Harrow Ex Parte Fahia, [19].

Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland v Lynch:

R v Antoine, [56].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Beard:

Grape Bay Limited v. The Attorney General, [15], [19].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Bugg:

R v Wicks, [56].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Camplin:

Greene Browne v. The Queen, [9].

D.R. Lange v. J.B. Atkinson and Australian Consolidated Press NZ Limited, [18].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Charles (Note&rparen:

DPP v Jackson, [47], [48], [48].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Donnelly:

DPP v Jackson, [17], [55].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Head:

Boddington v British Transport Police, [15], [19], [19], [23], [23], [34], [35].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Hutchinson:

Boddington v British Transport Police, [82].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Jones:

DPP v Jones, [4].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Morgan:

B v Director of Public Prosecutions, [17], [17], [17], [18], [72], [72].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Newbury:

Attorney General's Reference No. 3 of 1994, [87], [89], [90].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Rogers:

B v Director of Public Prosecutions, [5], [38].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith:

R v Woollin, [13], [13], [13].

Cletus Timothy, Dexter Reid and Sheldon Lewis v. The State, [59], [60].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Stonehouse:

R v Associated Octel Company Ltd, [21], [21].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Tokai:

Nankissoon Boodram (also known as Dole Chadee) and Others v. Cipriani Baptiste (Commissioner of Prisons) and Others, [9].

Director of Public Prosecutions v Warren:

DPP v Jackson, [10], [14], [17], [17], [17], [17], [18], [29], [32], [32], [33], [34], [36], [40], [41], [44], [44], [46], [46], [47], [47], [47], [48], [49], [50], [52], [52], [55], [55], [57].

Disparate treatment:

Barry v Midland Bank Plc., [27].

dispute, The :

Baltic Insurance Group v Jordan Grand Prix Ltd, [3].

Distillers Co (Biochemicals) Ltd v Thompson:

Berezovsky v Michaels, [30], [58], [102], [102], [103], [103], [105].

Dixon v Fisher:

Elitestone Ltd v Morris, [46].

Dobbs:

Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council, [12], [12], [13].

Dobson v General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation Plc:

Regina v. Hinks, [33].

Dobson v General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corporation Plc:

Regina v. Hinks, [98].

Docker v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police:

Taylor v Director of the Serious Fraud Office , [56].

Dodd Properties Ltd v Canterbury City Council:

Smith New Court Securities v Scrimgeour Vickers, [19].

Alcoa Minerals of Jamaica Inc. v. Herbert Broderick, [18], [39].

Doe d Beadon v Pyke:

Barrett v Morgan, [21].

Doe d Cox v Roe:

Mannai Investment Co. Ltd v Eagle Star Assurance Co. Ltd, [16].

Doe d Duke of Bedford v Kightley:

Mannai Investment Co. Ltd v Eagle Star Assurance Co. Ltd, [16], [16], [36].

Doe d Spicer v Lea:

Mannai Investment Co. Ltd v Eagle Star Assurance Co. Ltd, [85].

Doe dCox v Roe:

Mannai Investment Co. Ltd v Eagle Star Assurance Co. Ltd, [74].

Does Article IV r 6 provide a free-standing bundle of rights to carriers:

Effort Shipping Company Ltd v Linden Management SA, [54].

Doherty v McGlennan:

In re Pinochet, [68].

Ramnath Harrilal (No. 2) v. The State, [8].

Donnelly v Joyce:

Dimond v Lovell, [46], [47], [47], [49], [50].

Donoghue v Stevenson:

Jolley v Sutton London Borough Council, [36].

Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council, [97].

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd, [85].

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd, [149].

Donovan v Barnes:

Gregory v Portsmouth City Council, [30].

Dooley v Cammell Laird & Co Ltd:

White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, [67], [68], [91], [147].

Dorchester Studios (Glasgow) Ltd v Stone:

Dollar Land (Cumbernauld) Ltd v C.I.N Properties Ltd, [2].

Dorothy Mary Isobel Fletcher:

Preston v Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS and Others, [81].

Dorset:

Phelps v London Borough of Hillingdon, [66].

Dorset Yacht:

Barret v London Borough of Enfield, [47].

Dorset Yacht Co Ltd v Home Office:

Darker (Formerly Head) v Chief Constable of The West Midlands Police, [23].

Barret v London Borough of Enfield, [66], [67], [71], [102], [106], [111], [114], [124], [125], [127].

British Telecommunications PLC. v James Thomson and Sons (Engineers) Ltd, [9].

Dorset, Hampshire, Bromley:

Barret v London Borough of Enfield, [49], [50], [52], [53].

Doughty v General Dental Council:

Ramnath Harrilal (No. 2) v. The State, [40].

Douglas v Tucker:

Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd, [122].

Dovaston v Payne:

DPP v Jones, [61].

DPP v Jones, [172], [173].

Dover District Council v Farrar:

, [25].

Dow v Attorney-General:

Spiricor of St. Lucia Limited v. The Attorney General of St. Lucia and Hess Oil St. Lucia Limited, [26].

Downs v Chappell:

Smith New Court Securities v Scrimgeour Vickers, [18], [23], [72], [72], [73].

Dowty Boulton Paul Ltd v Wolverhampton Corporation:

Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd v Argyll Stores, [15].

Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd:

Smith New Court Securities v Scrimgeour Vickers, [15], [17], [18], [18], [18], [18], [21], [23], [32], [32], [69], [71], [71], [71], [71], [71], [71], [71], [71], [75].

DPP v Beard:

Attorney General's Reference No. 3 of 1994, [37].

DPP v Bignell:

R v Bow Street Magistrates Court Ex Parte USA, [26], [26], [29], [29], [35], [35], [36], [38].

DPP v Camplin:

R v Smith, [59], [60], [61], [67], [71], [74], [75], [77], [81], [87], [91], [102], [102], [102], [103], [104], [128], [131], [132], [135], [137], [138], [138], [138], [139], [139], [139], [150], [153], [154], [154], [156], [157], [157], [158], [213], [225], [225], [225], [225], [228], [228], [233], [242], [243], [246].

DPP v Lynch:

Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd, [137].

Main Menu for Table of Cases
Next part of this Table of Cases