Table of Paragraphs
  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91
Table of Cases

A

Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission: [19], [19], [20], [23], [32], [33], [33], [34], [36], [37], [43].
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation: [27], [27], [36], [76], [79], [79].

B

Bugg v Director of Public Prosecutions: [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [36], [38], [38], [62], [67], [71], [74], [74], [74], [74], [74], [76], [76], [76], [76], [77], [78], [81], [82], [82], [83], [83], [83], [85], [86], [86].
BUGG'S: [70], [73], [84].

C

Calvin v Carr: [54].
Chief Adjudication Officer v Foster: [82], [87], [89].
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service: [12].

D

Director of Public Prosecutions v Head: [15], [19], [19], [23], [23], [34], [35].
Director of Public Prosecutions v Hutchinson: [82].

E

Eshugbayi Eleko v Government of Nigeria: [83].

F

F Hoffmann-La Roche & Co AG v Secretary of State for Trade & Industry: [25], [29].
F Hoffmann-La Roche & Co Ltd v Secretary of State for Trade & Industry: [31], [43], [85].

H

Hoffmann--La Roche & Co AG v Secretary of State for Trade & Industry: [85].

K

Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council v Wickes Building Supplies Ltd: [25].
Kruse v Johnson: [28].

L

London & Clydeside Estates Ltd v Aberdeen District Council: [29].

M

Mercury Communications Ltd v Director General of Telecommunications: [82], [82].
Municipal Corporation of the City of Toronto v Virgo: [48].

O

O'Reilly v Mackman: [19], [82], [82].

P

Percy v Hall: [54].
Pyx Granite Co Ltd v Ministry of Housing & Local Government: [42].

Q

Quietlynn Ltd v Plymouth City Council: [41], [44], [62].
Quietlynn v Plymouth City Council: [62].

R

Reg v Chief Constable of the Thames Valley Police, Ex parte Cotton: [85].
Reg v Hull University Visitor, Ex parte Page: [19], [79].
Reg v Inland Revenue Commissioners, Ex parte TC Coombs & Co: [24].
Reg v Reading Crown Court, Ex parte Hutchinson: [28], [62], [86], [86], [89].
Reg v Wicks: [30], [36], [40], [41], [44], [45], [47], [58], [74], [74], [75], [77], [81], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87].
Ridge v Baldwin: [25], [85].
Roy v Kensington Family Practitioner Committee: [82].

S

Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council: [29], [31].

T

Tarr v Tarr: [48].

W

Wandsworth London Borough Council v Winder: [27], [32], [36], [42], [45], [82].