Table of Paragraphs  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110  111  112  113  114  115  116  117  118  119  120  121  122  123  124  125  126  127  128  129  130  131  132  133  134  135  136  137  138  139  140  141  142  143  144  145  146  147  148  149

Table of Cases

A

A v Liverpool City Council: [129], [138].

Anns v Merton London Borough Council: [67], [114], [118], [124].

B

Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee: [51], [74].

C

Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman: [4], [18], [35], [42], [48], [54], [71].

Capital Counties Plc v Hampshire County Council: [75].

Carmarthenshire County Council v Lewis: [62].

Child Abuse: Damages: [137].

D

David v Radcliffe: [99].

Dorset Yacht: [47].

Dorset Yacht Co Ltd v Home Office: [66], [67], [71], [102], [106], [111], [114], [124], [125], [127].

Dorset, Hampshire, Bromley: [49], [50], [52], [53].

F

Fisher v Ruislip-Northwood Urban District Council & Middlesex County Council: [100].

G

Gold v Essex County Council: [62].

H

H v Norfolk County Council: [35], [144].

Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire: [11].

Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd: [99].

J

just & reasonable test, The : [136].

Just v British Columbia: [121], [122].

L

Lonrho Plc v Tebbit: [99], [116], [134].

O

Osman v Ferguson: [11].

Osman v United Kingdom: [11], [14], [19], [19], [145].

P

Page v Smith: [87].

Phelps v Hillingdon London Borough Council: [9], [9], [83].

Proceedings, The : [30].

Q

quot;X": [35].

quot;X" v Bedfordshire: [42], [44], [44], [46], [46], [47], [54], [56], [57], [59], [62], [76], [80].

R

Reg v Chief Constable of Sussex, Ex parte International Trader's Ferry Ltd: [70].

Reg v Deputy Governor of Parkhurst, Ex parte Hague: [61].

Rowling v Takaro Properties Ltd: [72], [115], [117], [118], [120], [133].

S

S v W: [137].

standard of care, The : [147].

Stovin v Wise: [4], [32], [118], [131], [131].

Surtees v Kingston-Upon-Thames Borough Council: [137].

Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman: [103], [118], [121], [121], [135].

T

The just & reasonable test: [136].

The Proceedings: [30].

The standard of care: [147].

The X: [4], [4], [8], [9].

V

Van Oppen v Clerk to the Bedford Charity Trustees: [59].

W

Wednesbury: [133].

X

X (Minors) v Bedfordshire County Council: [32], [33], [118], [123], [123], [126], [128], [132], [140], [140], [140], [141], [143], [144].

X v Bedfordshire County Council: [4].

X, The : [4], [4], [8], [9].